Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19241 - 19250 of 47467 for WA 0852 2611 9277 Pemborong Kitchen Set PVC Profesional Depok town square Depok.

[PDF] State v. James R.K.
standards, a court can deviate from the percentage standards if, after considering the factors set forth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4445 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
issues lack arguable merit. The no-merit report sets forth an adequate discussion of these potential
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=269572 - 2020-07-14

[PDF] CA Blank Order
not pay for it; instead, he pulled out a gun, set it on his lap, and told M.B. to get out of the car
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=262710 - 2020-06-02

[PDF] CA Blank Order
for these proceedings as set forth in WIS. STAT. §§ 48.422(1)- (2), 48.424(4), and 48.427(1), or found good cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=760113 - 2024-02-06

COURT OF APPEALS
.[1] ¶7 A new factor is “a fact or set of facts highly relevant to the imposition of sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108402 - 2014-02-25

State v. Gilberto Flores
failed to provide the trial court with a sufficient factual basis to set the matter for a hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9864 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that the procedure set forth in WIS. STAT. § 968.12(3) (2013-14), to obtain the warrant was not strictly followed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185138 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
disclosures, and his sentencing was set over to allow the parties to address the new information. In February
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38005 - 2009-07-20

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. A new factor is defined as a fact or a set of facts that is “highly relevant to the imposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=970552 - 2025-06-18

Ray A. Peterson v. Mark Baker
for failure to appear on the date set for trial. Wis. Stat. § 799.22(1). Although default judgments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5501 - 2005-03-31