Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19241 - 19250 of 58509 for speedy trial.

State v. Randolph S. Miller
, that his trial counsel was ineffective for not terminating the plea negotiations and hearing, and that some
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5557 - 2005-03-31

State v. Randolph S. Miller
, that his trial counsel was ineffective for not terminating the plea negotiations and hearing, and that some
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5555 - 2005-03-31

State v. Randolph S. Miller
, that his trial counsel was ineffective for not terminating the plea negotiations and hearing, and that some
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5564 - 2005-03-31

State v. Randolph S. Miller
, that his trial counsel was ineffective for not terminating the plea negotiations and hearing, and that some
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5561 - 2005-03-31

State v. Randolph S. Miller
, that his trial counsel was ineffective for not terminating the plea negotiations and hearing, and that some
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5565 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Dana M. LeDuc v. Patrick J. Hayes
argues that (1) the trial court applied an erroneous legal standard when it denied her request to move
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6909 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Gerald Gielow v. Thaddeus F. G. Napiorkowski
purchased from them. At No. 03-0050 2 summary judgment, the trial court ruled that a “Release
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6032 - 2017-09-19

Gerald Gielow v. Thaddeus F. G. Napiorkowski
them. At summary judgment, the trial court ruled that a “Release of All Claims” given by the Gielows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6032 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Leon I. Metz v. Prism Corp.
that: (1) the trial court erred when it denied Metz's motion for summary judgment because Prism did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9343 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to a jury trial.3 The jury returned with guilty verdicts on three counts: two counts of first-degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=979187 - 2025-07-08