Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19251 - 19260 of 29823 for des.
Search results 19251 - 19260 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
State v. Brian Swift
of law we review de novo. State v. Pettit, 171 Wis. 2d 627, 639, 492 N.W.2d 633 (Ct. App. 1992
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6063 - 2017-09-19
of law we review de novo. State v. Pettit, 171 Wis. 2d 627, 639, 492 N.W.2d 633 (Ct. App. 1992
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6063 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. William G. Henriksen
a question of law that this court reviews de novo. State v. Oakley, 2001 WI 103, ¶8, 245 Wis. 2d 447
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7378 - 2017-09-20
a question of law that this court reviews de novo. State v. Oakley, 2001 WI 103, ¶8, 245 Wis. 2d 447
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7378 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Randy D. Stafford
presents a legal issue which we decide de novo. Id. Whether a new factor justifies sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4991 - 2017-09-19
presents a legal issue which we decide de novo. Id. Whether a new factor justifies sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4991 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
, the application of constitutional principles to those facts is a question of law which we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36686 - 2009-06-03
, the application of constitutional principles to those facts is a question of law which we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36686 - 2009-06-03
COURT OF APPEALS
and dismissed Houston’s claims. DISCUSSION ¶12 We review summary judgment decisions de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85660 - 2012-07-30
and dismissed Houston’s claims. DISCUSSION ¶12 We review summary judgment decisions de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85660 - 2012-07-30
[PDF]
State v. John R. Stambaugh
)(a), STATS., to undisputed facts presents a question of law this court reviews de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11922 - 2017-09-21
)(a), STATS., to undisputed facts presents a question of law this court reviews de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11922 - 2017-09-21
Anthony L. Alsum v. Wisconsin Department of Transportation
ATTORNEYS: On behalf of the plaintiffs-appellants, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Martin J. De
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6915 - 2005-03-31
ATTORNEYS: On behalf of the plaintiffs-appellants, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Martin J. De
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6915 - 2005-03-31
State v. Teressa S.
a question of law subject to de novo review. See State v. Patricia A.P., 195 Wis. 2d 855, 862-63, 537 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2500 - 2005-03-31
a question of law subject to de novo review. See State v. Patricia A.P., 195 Wis. 2d 855, 862-63, 537 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2500 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
performance was deficient and, if so, prejudicial, are questions of law that we review de novo. Id., 153 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84016 - 2012-06-25
performance was deficient and, if so, prejudicial, are questions of law that we review de novo. Id., 153 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84016 - 2012-06-25
[PDF]
WI APP 66
. The interpretation and application of a statute is a question of law that we review de novo. Xerox Corp. v. DOR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63115 - 2014-09-15
. The interpretation and application of a statute is a question of law that we review de novo. Xerox Corp. v. DOR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63115 - 2014-09-15