Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19261 - 19270 of 64735 for b's.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
these things was aggravating to the offense.” Horne argued that, “[b]ecause the court considered Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=919624 - 2025-02-26

Wendy Enright v. Pleasant View LTD Partnerships
a judgment of the circuit court for Racine County: ALLAN B. TORHORST, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14948 - 2005-03-31

Mary A. Kowalski v. Pinewood Supper Club
N.W.2d 175. Judicial review is “confined to questions of law.” Wis. Stat. § 108.09(7)(b).[2] We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25353 - 2006-05-30

[PDF] State v. Ronnie C. Barnes
sentence. Section 973.15(2)(a), STATS., provides: “Except as provided in par. (b), the court may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14283 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Rick J. Gurholt
a disturbance is guilty of a Class B misdemeanor.” The elements of disorderly conduct are: (1) The defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7230 - 2017-09-20

COURT OF APPEALS
contends that “[b]y preconceiving that Delarosa’s punishment should be similar to some other unidentified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136995 - 2015-03-09

[PDF] NOTICE
. § 108.09(7)(b) (2007-08).1 We uphold the Commission’s findings of fact as long as they are supported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53134 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
for their persuasive value, see Wis. Stat. § 809.23(3)(b); (2) per curiam opinions may not be cited as authoritative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48942 - 2010-04-13

[PDF] Raymond B. Schaefer v. David D. Boldt
OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT II RAYMOND B. SCHAEFER AND EDNA SCHAEFER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4078 - 2017-09-20

State v. Kimberly M. Desimone
the counter. See id. at 367, 370. The State also cites 1 Wayne R. LaFave, Search and Seizure § 2.6(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19730 - 2005-09-27