Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19261 - 19270 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 19261 - 19270 of 58492 for speedy trial.
State v. Shelly L. Fisher
. Fisher claims the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by refusing to honor the joint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4326 - 2005-03-31
. Fisher claims the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by refusing to honor the joint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4326 - 2005-03-31
Secura Insurance v. Steve Boshardy, Jr.
notwithstanding the verdict and, in the alternative, a new trial. The issues are: (1) whether the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8255 - 2005-03-31
notwithstanding the verdict and, in the alternative, a new trial. The issues are: (1) whether the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8255 - 2005-03-31
WMC Mortgage Corporation v. John Henry Burckhardt
it was offered in silver coin; and (4) the trial court improperly precluded Burckhardt from offering evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3693 - 2005-03-31
it was offered in silver coin; and (4) the trial court improperly precluded Burckhardt from offering evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3693 - 2005-03-31
Susan Bauer v. Village of DeForest
of a prior version of § 11.08(3). The trial court held it constitutional, as did this court on appeal. Both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4132 - 2005-03-31
of a prior version of § 11.08(3). The trial court held it constitutional, as did this court on appeal. Both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4132 - 2005-03-31
State v. James L. Thompson
a corpse as a habitual criminal. He argues that the trial court improperly exercised its discretion when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13149 - 2005-03-31
a corpse as a habitual criminal. He argues that the trial court improperly exercised its discretion when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13149 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Lee Kremsreiter v. Marathon County
. The trial court correctly granted the County summary judgment if there was no dispute of material fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8606 - 2017-09-19
. The trial court correctly granted the County summary judgment if there was no dispute of material fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8606 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. David W. Hendricks
contends that the trial court erroneously limited his cross-examination in two regards. First, Hendricks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8311 - 2017-09-19
contends that the trial court erroneously limited his cross-examination in two regards. First, Hendricks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8311 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Corey O. Mackin
was inadmissible. Because we conclude the trial court based its discretionary evidentiary decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7592 - 2017-09-19
was inadmissible. Because we conclude the trial court based its discretionary evidentiary decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7592 - 2017-09-19
Sophie Felckowski v. Herman Felckowski
property. We affirm on the first two issues, and reverse the trial court’s ruling on the third
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14012 - 2005-03-31
property. We affirm on the first two issues, and reverse the trial court’s ruling on the third
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14012 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
, and an order denying his postconviction motion for relief from those judgments. Conley argues that trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93192 - 2013-02-18
, and an order denying his postconviction motion for relief from those judgments. Conley argues that trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93192 - 2013-02-18