Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19271 - 19280 of 59281 for SMALL CLAIMS.

COURT OF APPEALS
, but also never said the judge was bound by the plea agreement. ¶7 In denying relief on this claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76597 - 2012-01-17

[PDF] CA Blank Order
appeals. As noted above, Dahlk’s 2006 sentence modification motion raised a claim that the circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158625 - 2017-09-21

State v. Melvin Caballero
an order denying his post-conviction motion. Caballero claims: (1) that he was denied effective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9337 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
and reconsideration. Owens also claims for the first time on appeal that his appellate counsel abandoned him. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145061 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Douglas E. Smith
. § 939.62, and from the trial court’s order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4933 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Thomas G. v. Michael R.
. 1 Tara’s parents also brought a claim against Georgia B., Roger B.’s mother, which was later
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5521 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Bank One Wisconsin Trust Company, N.A. v. Cotton Mills Associates Limited Partnership
Authority of the City of Janesville (collectively the City) claim an interest in the property. The City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9458 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Catherine J. Farrey v. Russell S. Gonnering
summary judgment and dismissing her claim against Russell S. Gonnering, Janice Krebs, Oculoplastic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9557 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
was afforded the opportunity to withdraw his plea before sentencing. This claim has no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97900 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
and substantive law governing their claims. See State ex rel. Wren v. Richardson, 2019 WI 110, ¶25, 389 Wis. 2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=432639 - 2021-09-29