Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19271 - 19280 of 58509 for speedy trial.
Search results 19271 - 19280 of 58509 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
WMC Mortgage Corporation v. John Henry Burckhardt
of $26.10 should have taken precedence because it was offered in silver coin; and (4) the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3693 - 2017-09-19
of $26.10 should have taken precedence because it was offered in silver coin; and (4) the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3693 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Michael S. Alberts, Jr.
. 1 The single issue in these three consolidated appeals is whether the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3722 - 2017-09-19
. 1 The single issue in these three consolidated appeals is whether the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3722 - 2017-09-19
State v. Karen Elaine Gilligan
conviction at the nonjury trial was "unjust" because it was based on "hearsay evidence without consideration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12726 - 2005-03-31
conviction at the nonjury trial was "unjust" because it was based on "hearsay evidence without consideration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12726 - 2005-03-31
State v. Shelly L. Fisher
. Fisher claims the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by refusing to honor the joint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4326 - 2005-03-31
. Fisher claims the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by refusing to honor the joint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4326 - 2005-03-31
WMC Mortgage Corporation v. John Henry Burckhardt
it was offered in silver coin; and (4) the trial court improperly precluded Burckhardt from offering evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3693 - 2005-03-31
it was offered in silver coin; and (4) the trial court improperly precluded Burckhardt from offering evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3693 - 2005-03-31
Susan Bauer v. Village of DeForest
of a prior version of § 11.08(3). The trial court held it constitutional, as did this court on appeal. Both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4132 - 2005-03-31
of a prior version of § 11.08(3). The trial court held it constitutional, as did this court on appeal. Both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4132 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Lee Kremsreiter v. Marathon County
. The trial court correctly granted the County summary judgment if there was no dispute of material fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8606 - 2017-09-19
. The trial court correctly granted the County summary judgment if there was no dispute of material fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8606 - 2017-09-19
Sophie Felckowski v. Herman Felckowski
property. We affirm on the first two issues, and reverse the trial court’s ruling on the third
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14012 - 2005-03-31
property. We affirm on the first two issues, and reverse the trial court’s ruling on the third
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14012 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
, and an order denying his postconviction motion for relief from those judgments. Conley argues that trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93192 - 2013-02-18
, and an order denying his postconviction motion for relief from those judgments. Conley argues that trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93192 - 2013-02-18
Patricia Radigan Brophy v. Michael E. Radigan
. Radigan. Because we conclude that the trial court properly ruled that Radigan did not gift an investment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10385 - 2005-03-31
. Radigan. Because we conclude that the trial court properly ruled that Radigan did not gift an investment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10385 - 2005-03-31