Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19281 - 19290 of 29740 for des.
Search results 19281 - 19290 of 29740 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and application of a statute to undisputed facts presents a question of law subject to de novo review. McNeil v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117398 - 2017-09-21
and application of a statute to undisputed facts presents a question of law subject to de novo review. McNeil v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117398 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for protective placement is a question of law that we review de novo. Coston, 222 Wis. 2d 23. ¶7 Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=556912 - 2022-08-22
for protective placement is a question of law that we review de novo. Coston, 222 Wis. 2d 23. ¶7 Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=556912 - 2022-08-22
State v. Bernard E. Burgess
whether a set of facts constitutes a new factor de novo. State v. Franklin, 148 Wis. 2d 1,8, 434 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3279 - 2005-03-31
whether a set of facts constitutes a new factor de novo. State v. Franklin, 148 Wis. 2d 1,8, 434 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3279 - 2005-03-31
Charlotte A. Bausano v. James J. Bausano
and credibility of the valuation evidence was for the circuit court to decide, not for this court to decide de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2441 - 2005-03-31
and credibility of the valuation evidence was for the circuit court to decide, not for this court to decide de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2441 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. See McNeil v. Hansen, 2007 WI 56, ¶7, 300 Wis. 2d 358, 731 N.W.2d 273. ¶10 “[S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=987257 - 2025-07-22
review de novo. See McNeil v. Hansen, 2007 WI 56, ¶7, 300 Wis. 2d 358, 731 N.W.2d 273. ¶10 “[S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=987257 - 2025-07-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
DISCUSSION ¶7 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116172 - 2017-09-21
DISCUSSION ¶7 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116172 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of law de novo.” Id. 4 See Northern States Power Co
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=517333 - 2022-05-03
of law de novo.” Id. 4 See Northern States Power Co
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=517333 - 2022-05-03
[PDF]
State v. David L. Reynolds
is a question of constitutional law which we review de novo. Id. We employ a two-step test to analyze
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10315 - 2017-09-20
is a question of constitutional law which we review de novo. Id. We employ a two-step test to analyze
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10315 - 2017-09-20
Waukesha County v. Steven H.
is a question of law we review de novo, see id. at 634, 369 N.W.2d at 715. Further, whether counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14674 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law we review de novo, see id. at 634, 369 N.W.2d at 715. Further, whether counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14674 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the allegations are sufficient. ¶11 “The sufficiency of a complaint is a matter of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=422824 - 2021-09-09
that the allegations are sufficient. ¶11 “The sufficiency of a complaint is a matter of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=422824 - 2021-09-09