Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19291 - 19300 of 29823 for des.
Search results 19291 - 19300 of 29823 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
the application of a statute to undisputed facts. As such, our standard of review is de novo. See Gonzalez v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36301 - 2009-04-28
the application of a statute to undisputed facts. As such, our standard of review is de novo. See Gonzalez v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36301 - 2009-04-28
State v. Earl Steele III
appeals. ANALYSIS ¶4 We review de novo a circuit court’s conclusion that a guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2174 - 2005-03-31
appeals. ANALYSIS ¶4 We review de novo a circuit court’s conclusion that a guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2174 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
prejudiced the defendant are questions of law that we review de novo. Id. at 128. With these principles
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145914 - 2017-09-21
prejudiced the defendant are questions of law that we review de novo. Id. at 128. With these principles
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145914 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
to and not excluded by the court, the motion shall be treated as one for summary judgment.”).1 We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30296 - 2014-09-15
to and not excluded by the court, the motion shall be treated as one for summary judgment.”).1 We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30296 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
David Kosmo v. State of Wisconsin Department of Transportation
associated with removing it. Kosmo appeals the summary judgment. We review a summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11352 - 2017-09-19
associated with removing it. Kosmo appeals the summary judgment. We review a summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11352 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of a statute to a particular set of facts presents a question of law that we review de novo. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88622 - 2014-09-15
of a statute to a particular set of facts presents a question of law that we review de novo. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88622 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Darryl A. Harding
of the vehicle in which Harding was a passenger presents a question of law which we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4008 - 2017-09-20
of the vehicle in which Harding was a passenger presents a question of law which we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4008 - 2017-09-20
Eugene Hafner v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
, 102 Wis. 2d 256, 260, 306 N.W.2d 79 (Ct. App. 1981). Appellants argue that our review should be de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2304 - 2005-03-31
, 102 Wis. 2d 256, 260, 306 N.W.2d 79 (Ct. App. 1981). Appellants argue that our review should be de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2304 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
/Bentley motion is de novo. See Howell, 301 Wis. 2d 350, ¶78. We determine as a matter of law “whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49241 - 2014-09-15
/Bentley motion is de novo. See Howell, 301 Wis. 2d 350, ¶78. We determine as a matter of law “whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49241 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 46
interpretation which we review de novo. See State v. Nellessen, 2014 WI 84, ¶13, 360 Wis. 2d 493, 849 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168314 - 2017-09-21
interpretation which we review de novo. See State v. Nellessen, 2014 WI 84, ¶13, 360 Wis. 2d 493, 849 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168314 - 2017-09-21