Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19291 - 19300 of 29823 for des.
Search results 19291 - 19300 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Carlson’s revocation decision. After reviewing the evidence de novo, DHA concluded that DOC had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=800811 - 2024-05-14
Carlson’s revocation decision. After reviewing the evidence de novo, DHA concluded that DOC had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=800811 - 2024-05-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the constitutional standard for effective assistance is ultimately a legal determination that this court decides de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=739768 - 2023-12-12
the constitutional standard for effective assistance is ultimately a legal determination that this court decides de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=739768 - 2023-12-12
[PDF]
NOTICE
On our de novo review of the trial court’s legal analysis, and giving its implicit findings of fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59513 - 2014-09-15
On our de novo review of the trial court’s legal analysis, and giving its implicit findings of fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59513 - 2014-09-15
David Paustenbach v. John Vishnevsky
At the outset, we reject Vishnevsky’s suggestion that our standard of review is de novo because the issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3145 - 2005-03-31
At the outset, we reject Vishnevsky’s suggestion that our standard of review is de novo because the issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3145 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jessie Redmond
which this court reviews de novo. Rhonda R.D. v. Franklin R.D., 191 Wis.2d 680, 703, 530 N.W.2d 34, 43
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7917 - 2005-03-31
which this court reviews de novo. Rhonda R.D. v. Franklin R.D., 191 Wis.2d 680, 703, 530 N.W.2d 34, 43
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7917 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kristen K. Cleaver
purposes is a question of law, which we review de novo based on the facts as found by the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20061 - 2005-10-25
purposes is a question of law, which we review de novo based on the facts as found by the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20061 - 2005-10-25
[PDF]
State v. Everton Taylor
of the evidence,” State v. Mitchell, 167 Wis. 2d 672, 682, 482 N.W.2d 364 (1992), and we determine de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3438 - 2017-09-19
of the evidence,” State v. Mitchell, 167 Wis. 2d 672, 682, 482 N.W.2d 364 (1992), and we determine de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3438 - 2017-09-19
WI App 45 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP31 Complete Title of C...
that is “very nearly” one of first impression will receive “due weight” deference. Id. Finally, a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94555 - 2013-11-17
that is “very nearly” one of first impression will receive “due weight” deference. Id. Finally, a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94555 - 2013-11-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. DISCUSSION ¶9 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo. Enea v. Linn, 2002 WI App 185, ¶11, 256
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142715 - 2017-09-21
. DISCUSSION ¶9 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo. Enea v. Linn, 2002 WI App 185, ¶11, 256
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142715 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, and uphold them unless they are clearly erroneous. Second, we review de novo the application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=892290 - 2024-12-26
, and uphold them unless they are clearly erroneous. Second, we review de novo the application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=892290 - 2024-12-26