Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19291 - 19300 of 64056 for records/1000.
Search results 19291 - 19300 of 64056 for records/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not done so. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and an independent review of the Record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=655893 - 2023-05-17
not done so. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and an independent review of the Record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=655893 - 2023-05-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
denying his postconviction motion for a new trial.1 Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252918 - 2020-01-24
denying his postconviction motion for a new trial.1 Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252918 - 2020-01-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independently reviewed the entire record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967), we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=682386 - 2023-07-25
independently reviewed the entire record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967), we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=682386 - 2023-07-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
consideration of the report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236388 - 2019-03-06
consideration of the report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236388 - 2019-03-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
there was systematic exclusion of African-Americans from the jury venire. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209415 - 2018-03-06
there was systematic exclusion of African-Americans from the jury venire. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209415 - 2018-03-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
filing a response to the report. Upon this court’s independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114649 - 2017-09-21
filing a response to the report. Upon this court’s independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114649 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
and after conducting an independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95281 - 2014-09-15
and after conducting an independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95281 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2018AP857-CRNM 2 Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256581 - 2020-03-17
. No. 2018AP857-CRNM 2 Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256581 - 2020-03-17
CA Blank Order
in Wis. Stat. §§ 815.31 and 846.16 (2011-12).[1] Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110577 - 2014-04-16
in Wis. Stat. §§ 815.31 and 846.16 (2011-12).[1] Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110577 - 2014-04-16
COURT OF APPEALS
of further criminal activity,” and “the defendant’s record, attitude, and capacity for rehabilitation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34837 - 2008-12-08
of further criminal activity,” and “the defendant’s record, attitude, and capacity for rehabilitation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34837 - 2008-12-08