Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19291 - 19300 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 19291 - 19300 of 58492 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. RULE 809.23(3). Humberto Santiago appeals judgments convicting him after a jury trial of seven counts
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=584861 - 2022-11-01
. RULE 809.23(3). Humberto Santiago appeals judgments convicting him after a jury trial of seven counts
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=584861 - 2022-11-01
[PDF]
State v. David W. Hendricks
contends that the trial court erroneously limited his cross-examination in two regards. First, Hendricks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8311 - 2017-09-19
contends that the trial court erroneously limited his cross-examination in two regards. First, Hendricks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8311 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Warren Slocum v. Sandra Hohman
of the initial judgment. He specifically challenges the trial court’s decisions allowing him to seek
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14644 - 2017-09-21
of the initial judgment. He specifically challenges the trial court’s decisions allowing him to seek
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14644 - 2017-09-21
State v. Dean A Goehring, Sr.
was entered after revocation of Goehring’s probation. The issues are whether the trial court failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11616 - 2005-03-31
was entered after revocation of Goehring’s probation. The issues are whether the trial court failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11616 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. William J. Perry
by informing the trial court of an additional conviction, altering the sentencing matrix score on which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9732 - 2017-09-19
by informing the trial court of an additional conviction, altering the sentencing matrix score on which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9732 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Corey O. Mackin
was inadmissible. Because we conclude the trial court based its discretionary evidentiary decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7592 - 2017-09-19
was inadmissible. Because we conclude the trial court based its discretionary evidentiary decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7592 - 2017-09-19
Sophie Felckowski v. Herman Felckowski
property. We affirm on the first two issues, and reverse the trial court’s ruling on the third
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14012 - 2005-03-31
property. We affirm on the first two issues, and reverse the trial court’s ruling on the third
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14012 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
trial, the trial court directed a verdict in favor of the State after Froust presented her case-in-chief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106669 - 2014-01-14
trial, the trial court directed a verdict in favor of the State after Froust presented her case-in-chief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106669 - 2014-01-14
CA Blank Order
, and an order denying his postconviction motion for relief from those judgments. Conley argues that trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93192 - 2013-02-18
, and an order denying his postconviction motion for relief from those judgments. Conley argues that trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93192 - 2013-02-18
State v. Thomas R. Tisher
conference, the trial court suggested a form of verdict that would ask the jury whether Tisher was guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3253 - 2005-03-31
conference, the trial court suggested a form of verdict that would ask the jury whether Tisher was guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3253 - 2005-03-31