Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1931 - 1940 of 16409 for commenting.
Search results 1931 - 1940 of 16409 for commenting.
[PDF]
State v. Maxine Anderson
the prosecutor to refrain from such comments. ¶7 Anderson also argues that the prosecutor improperly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3650 - 2017-09-19
the prosecutor to refrain from such comments. ¶7 Anderson also argues that the prosecutor improperly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3650 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Sameeh J. Pickens
factors. Having reviewed the trial No(s). 99-1529-CR 2 court’s comments in context, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15631 - 2017-09-21
factors. Having reviewed the trial No(s). 99-1529-CR 2 court’s comments in context, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15631 - 2017-09-21
State v. Bruce M. Saks
should be imposed concurrently or consecutively. He points to the prosecutor’s comment that, “Mr. Saks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12890 - 2005-03-31
should be imposed concurrently or consecutively. He points to the prosecutor’s comment that, “Mr. Saks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12890 - 2005-03-31
State v. George D. Thomas
factors by commenting that Thomas was a frequent drug dealer, and by sentencing him more severely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3172 - 2005-03-31
factors by commenting that Thomas was a frequent drug dealer, and by sentencing him more severely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3172 - 2005-03-31
State v. Sameeh J. Pickens
to give consideration to other mitigating factors. Having reviewed the trial court’s comments in context
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15631 - 2005-03-31
to give consideration to other mitigating factors. Having reviewed the trial court’s comments in context
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15631 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. George D. Thomas
Thomas also contends that the trial court relied on improper factors by commenting that Thomas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3172 - 2017-09-19
Thomas also contends that the trial court relied on improper factors by commenting that Thomas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3172 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of violent behavior, commenting that “the [COMPAS] showing the concerns or the high violent recidivism rate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115626 - 2017-09-21
of violent behavior, commenting that “the [COMPAS] showing the concerns or the high violent recidivism rate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115626 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
also argues the circuit court burnished its sentencing comments “with matters outside the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=419109 - 2021-08-31
also argues the circuit court burnished its sentencing comments “with matters outside the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=419109 - 2021-08-31
[PDF]
State v. Stanley Lindsey
of the offense.” Lindsey asserts that certain comments made by the trial court during sentencing demonstrate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2121 - 2017-09-19
of the offense.” Lindsey asserts that certain comments made by the trial court during sentencing demonstrate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2121 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
comments the agent made in the “Agent’s Assessment and Impressions” section of the PSI. In particular
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=150292 - 2017-09-21
comments the agent made in the “Agent’s Assessment and Impressions” section of the PSI. In particular
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=150292 - 2017-09-21