Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1931 - 1940 of 3973 for davi.
Search results 1931 - 1940 of 3973 for davi.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. See Davis v. United States, 564 U.S. 229, 236-37 (2011). However, the good faith exception
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250474 - 2019-11-21
. See Davis v. United States, 564 U.S. 229, 236-37 (2011). However, the good faith exception
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250474 - 2019-11-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. Davis, 2005 WI App 98, ¶15, 281 Wis. 2d 118, 698 N.W.2d 823 (citation omitted). ¶9 The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141395 - 2015-05-12
. Davis, 2005 WI App 98, ¶15, 281 Wis. 2d 118, 698 N.W.2d 823 (citation omitted). ¶9 The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141395 - 2015-05-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
argument, claims of error are forfeited. See Davis v. State, 61 Wis. 2d 284, 287, 212 N.W.2d 139 (1973
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162157 - 2017-09-21
argument, claims of error are forfeited. See Davis v. State, 61 Wis. 2d 284, 287, 212 N.W.2d 139 (1973
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162157 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Bret L. May v. Timothy A. Bonngard
reasonably exercised its discretion. State v. Davis, 2001 WI 136, ¶28, 248 Wis. 2d 986, 637 N.W.2d 62
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20994 - 2017-09-21
reasonably exercised its discretion. State v. Davis, 2001 WI 136, ¶28, 248 Wis. 2d 986, 637 N.W.2d 62
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20994 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Reilly, P.J., Gundrum and Davis, JJ. Per curiam opinions may not be cited in any court of this state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258636 - 2020-05-08
Reilly, P.J., Gundrum and Davis, JJ. Per curiam opinions may not be cited in any court of this state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258636 - 2020-05-08
COURT OF APPEALS
.” State v. Davis, 2005 WI App 98, ¶27, 281 Wis. 2d 118, 698 N.W.2d 823. Moreover, the sentencing court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77723 - 2012-02-07
.” State v. Davis, 2005 WI App 98, ¶27, 281 Wis. 2d 118, 698 N.W.2d 823. Moreover, the sentencing court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77723 - 2012-02-07
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 20, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
to unduly prejudicial evidence. State v. Davis, 2002 WI 75, ¶21, 254 Wis. 2d 1, 645 N.W.2d 913. To fulfill
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27439 - 2006-12-19
to unduly prejudicial evidence. State v. Davis, 2002 WI 75, ¶21, 254 Wis. 2d 1, 645 N.W.2d 913. To fulfill
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27439 - 2006-12-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
-testimonial. See Davis v. Washington, 547 U.S. 813, 817-18, 828 (2006) (holding that 911 caller’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=320509 - 2021-01-12
-testimonial. See Davis v. Washington, 547 U.S. 813, 817-18, 828 (2006) (holding that 911 caller’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=320509 - 2021-01-12
[PDF]
_WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
State v. Shaniece T. Davis 03-30-2021 Affirmed/reversed/remanded 2019AP001433 Kimberly C. Niemi v
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=366144 - 2021-05-10
State v. Shaniece T. Davis 03-30-2021 Affirmed/reversed/remanded 2019AP001433 Kimberly C. Niemi v
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=366144 - 2021-05-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-APPELLANT. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Waukesha County: J. MAC DAVIS, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66673 - 2014-09-15
-APPELLANT. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Waukesha County: J. MAC DAVIS, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66673 - 2014-09-15