Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1931 - 1940 of 29957 for de.

[PDF] Interlaken Service Corporation v. Interlaken Condominium Association, Inc.
. Whether a complaint states a cause of action is a question of law which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12362 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, requesting de novo review of Parisi’s motion to dismiss. On February 18, 2014, Finnegan filed a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124880 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
for trial, requesting de novo review of Parisi’s motion to dismiss. On February 18, 2014, Finnegan filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=124880 - 2014-10-22

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2012AP20 4 Standard of Review ¶5 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94012 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. Strasser v. Transtech Mobile Fleet Serv., Inc., 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208832 - 2018-02-27

[PDF] State v. James L. Holloway
of a motion for a Machner hearing de novo. State v. Tatum, 191 Wis.2d 547, 551, 530 N.W.2d 407, 408 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8115 - 2017-09-19

State v. Antonio Valtierrez
the deficient performance prejudiced the defendant present questions of law, which we review de novo. Pitsch
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5517 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Floyd Carter
either the deficiency or the prejudice prong is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16079 - 2017-09-21

State v. Floyd Carter
either the deficiency or the prejudice prong is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16079 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
and the jury verdict. Standard of Review ¶5 We review a grant or denial of summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30068 - 2007-08-22