Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1931 - 1940 of 29713 for des.
Search results 1931 - 1940 of 29713 for des.
Ronald W. Morters v. Aiken & Scoptur
court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo, and we apply the same standards as did the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6535 - 2005-03-31
court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo, and we apply the same standards as did the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6535 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Floyd Carter
either the deficiency or the prejudice prong is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16079 - 2017-09-21
either the deficiency or the prejudice prong is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16079 - 2017-09-21
State of Wisconsin v. Gale D. Nelson
. Klessig, 211 Wis. 2d 194, 204, 564 N.W.2d 716 (1997). “We review such a question de novo, independently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25964 - 2006-07-19
. Klessig, 211 Wis. 2d 194, 204, 564 N.W.2d 716 (1997). “We review such a question de novo, independently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25964 - 2006-07-19
Jane Doe v. General Motors Acceptance Corporation
We review an order granting summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards as the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2685 - 2005-03-31
We review an order granting summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards as the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2685 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
.” The interpretation of a contract is a question of law that we review de novo. Ford Motor Co. v. Lyons, 137 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49476 - 2014-09-15
.” The interpretation of a contract is a question of law that we review de novo. Ford Motor Co. v. Lyons, 137 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49476 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
is entitled to the incentives.[2] A court commissioner dismissed the case and Goodavage requested a trial de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90207 - 2012-12-05
is entitled to the incentives.[2] A court commissioner dismissed the case and Goodavage requested a trial de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90207 - 2012-12-05
COURT OF APPEALS
and the jury verdict. Standard of Review ¶5 We review a grant or denial of summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30068 - 2007-08-22
and the jury verdict. Standard of Review ¶5 We review a grant or denial of summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30068 - 2007-08-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
with Smith were left to Stelow’s sole discretion. Smith moved the circuit court for de novo review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1001669 - 2025-08-26
with Smith were left to Stelow’s sole discretion. Smith moved the circuit court for de novo review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1001669 - 2025-08-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
No. 2011AP2712 5 v. Altenberg, 144 Wis. 2d 223, 228, 424 N.W.2d 159 (1988). Our review is de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85730 - 2014-09-15
No. 2011AP2712 5 v. Altenberg, 144 Wis. 2d 223, 228, 424 N.W.2d 159 (1988). Our review is de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85730 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Converse and Lovina Smith v. Wisconsin Institute for Torah Study, Inc.
of an ordinance1 is a question of law we review de novo. Kannenberg v. LIRC, 213 Wis.2d 373, 384, 571 N.W.2d 165
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11552 - 2017-09-19
of an ordinance1 is a question of law we review de novo. Kannenberg v. LIRC, 213 Wis.2d 373, 384, 571 N.W.2d 165
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11552 - 2017-09-19