Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1931 - 1940 of 29810 for des.

[PDF] State v. James L. Holloway
of a motion for a Machner hearing de novo. State v. Tatum, 191 Wis.2d 547, 551, 530 N.W.2d 407, 408 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8115 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
and the jury verdict. Standard of Review ¶5 We review a grant or denial of summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30068 - 2007-08-22

[PDF] Robert Kucharski v. Andrew L. Kucharski, Jr.
and 2 based on the April 1998 deed from his father presents a question of law this court reviews de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3133 - 2017-09-19

State v. Antonio Valtierrez
the deficient performance prejudiced the defendant present questions of law, which we review de novo. Pitsch
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5517 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
(1980). Whether a contract is ambiguous also is a question of law that we review de novo. Wausau
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91898 - 2013-01-23

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the case and Goodavage requested a trial de novo before the circuit court. ¶8 While Goodavage’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90207 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. Strasser v. Transtech Mobile Fleet Serv., Inc., 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208832 - 2018-02-27

State v. James L. Holloway
for a Machner hearing de novo. State v. Tatum, 191 Wis.2d 547, 551, 530 N.W.2d 407, 408 (Ct. App. 1995). We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8115 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a sufficient reason for failing to bring available claims earlier is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247599 - 2019-10-01

State of Wisconsin v. Gale D. Nelson
. Klessig, 211 Wis. 2d 194, 204, 564 N.W.2d 716 (1997). “We review such a question de novo, independently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25964 - 2006-07-19