Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1931 - 1940 of 6328 for dr.
Search results 1931 - 1940 of 6328 for dr.
[PDF]
State v. Willie B.
” testimony. Specifically, Latrina argues that throughout the testimony of Dr. Christina Diorio
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7199 - 2017-09-20
” testimony. Specifically, Latrina argues that throughout the testimony of Dr. Christina Diorio
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7199 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Steven R. Stein v. State of Wisconsin Psychology Examining Board
, [Susan] and her husband had a joint therapy session with Dr. Stein. Following that session, her husband
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5761 - 2017-09-19
, [Susan] and her husband had a joint therapy session with Dr. Stein. Following that session, her husband
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5761 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
. She asked her obstetrician, Dr. Bodner, to perform a tubal ligation, which he did on August 4, 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32481 - 2009-07-06
. She asked her obstetrician, Dr. Bodner, to perform a tubal ligation, which he did on August 4, 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32481 - 2009-07-06
[PDF]
Francois J. Saculla, M.D. v. State of Wisconsin Medical Examining Board
. Before Anderson, P.J., Nettesheim and Snyder, JJ. ANDERSON, P.J. Dr. Francois J. Saculla appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9129 - 2017-09-19
. Before Anderson, P.J., Nettesheim and Snyder, JJ. ANDERSON, P.J. Dr. Francois J. Saculla appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9129 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Ward J.
” testimony. Specifically, Latrina argues that throughout the testimony of Dr. Christina Diorio
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7532 - 2017-09-19
” testimony. Specifically, Latrina argues that throughout the testimony of Dr. Christina Diorio
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7532 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
In addition to the victims’ testimony, the State presented the testimony of Dr. Fredrik Broekhuizen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103830 - 2017-09-21
In addition to the victims’ testimony, the State presented the testimony of Dr. Fredrik Broekhuizen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103830 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Latrina W.
” testimony. Specifically, Latrina argues that throughout the testimony of Dr. Christina Diorio
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7151 - 2017-09-20
” testimony. Specifically, Latrina argues that throughout the testimony of Dr. Christina Diorio
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7151 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
, the jury asked to see the report of psychologist Dr. William Schmitt, one of the State’s experts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102022 - 2013-09-17
, the jury asked to see the report of psychologist Dr. William Schmitt, one of the State’s experts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102022 - 2013-09-17
COURT OF APPEALS
was examined by Dr. Max Ots. Dr. Ots concluded that while Thoms had preexisting degenerative changes, the work
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35746 - 2009-03-04
was examined by Dr. Max Ots. Dr. Ots concluded that while Thoms had preexisting degenerative changes, the work
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35746 - 2009-03-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
right now.” If treatment were withdrawn, Dr. Hussain testified Kimberly would become a proper subject
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145256 - 2017-09-21
right now.” If treatment were withdrawn, Dr. Hussain testified Kimberly would become a proper subject
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145256 - 2017-09-21