Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1931 - 1940 of 6369 for dr.
Search results 1931 - 1940 of 6369 for dr.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as to warrant a discharge trial. Smith points to a report submitted by Dr. Courtney Endres, who opined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=393466 - 2021-07-20
as to warrant a discharge trial. Smith points to a report submitted by Dr. Courtney Endres, who opined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=393466 - 2021-07-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, the jury asked to see the report of psychologist Dr. William Schmitt, one of the State’s experts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102022 - 2017-09-21
, the jury asked to see the report of psychologist Dr. William Schmitt, one of the State’s experts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102022 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. William Wilson Gordon
medical expert, Dr. Daniel Icenogle, both testified that Gordon was fully circumcised. Based upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12843 - 2017-09-21
medical expert, Dr. Daniel Icenogle, both testified that Gordon was fully circumcised. Based upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12843 - 2017-09-21
State v. Matthew E. Haas
, that the circuit court restrict the testimony of Haas’s treating physician and also Dr. Lance P. Longo, Haas’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19944 - 2005-10-18
, that the circuit court restrict the testimony of Haas’s treating physician and also Dr. Lance P. Longo, Haas’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19944 - 2005-10-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
right now.” If treatment were withdrawn, Dr. Hussain testified Kimberly would become a proper subject
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145256 - 2017-09-21
right now.” If treatment were withdrawn, Dr. Hussain testified Kimberly would become a proper subject
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145256 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
, the jury asked to see the report of psychologist Dr. William Schmitt, one of the State’s experts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102022 - 2013-09-17
, the jury asked to see the report of psychologist Dr. William Schmitt, one of the State’s experts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102022 - 2013-09-17
COURT OF APPEALS
was examined by Dr. Max Ots. Dr. Ots concluded that while Thoms had preexisting degenerative changes, the work
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35746 - 2011-10-24
was examined by Dr. Max Ots. Dr. Ots concluded that while Thoms had preexisting degenerative changes, the work
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35746 - 2011-10-24
CA Blank Order
. § 51.61(1)(g)4. The County presented testimony at the commitment extension hearing from psychiatrist Dr
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93167 - 2013-02-18
. § 51.61(1)(g)4. The County presented testimony at the commitment extension hearing from psychiatrist Dr
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93167 - 2013-02-18
State v. Allen M.
phase under § 48.427(2), Stats. During the dispositional phase, Dr. David Tick
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12260 - 2005-03-31
phase under § 48.427(2), Stats. During the dispositional phase, Dr. David Tick
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12260 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Allen M.
and proceeded to the dispositional phase under § 48.427(2), STATS. During the dispositional phase, Dr. David
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12260 - 2017-09-21
and proceeded to the dispositional phase under § 48.427(2), STATS. During the dispositional phase, Dr. David
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12260 - 2017-09-21