Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1931 - 1940 of 68875 for he.
Search results 1931 - 1940 of 68875 for he.
State v. Emlin E. Landreth
After sentencing, Landreth moved to withdraw his no contest plea. He alleged that at the time he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4238 - 2005-03-31
After sentencing, Landreth moved to withdraw his no contest plea. He alleged that at the time he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4238 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael C. Cull
, and contends that the trial court erred by finding that he refused the test before he allegedly received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13225 - 2005-03-31
, and contends that the trial court erred by finding that he refused the test before he allegedly received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13225 - 2005-03-31
Superior Water Light & Power Co. v. Kevin Peterson
. He argues that: (1) The trial court erred by finding that a contract existed between himself
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8305 - 2005-03-31
. He argues that: (1) The trial court erred by finding that a contract existed between himself
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8305 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Joshua J. Alderman
2004AP1686 2 and as party to a crime. Alderman argues: (1) that he received ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20459 - 2017-09-21
2004AP1686 2 and as party to a crime. Alderman argues: (1) that he received ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20459 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
alleged that the plea colloquy was defective because he was not advised of the sexual contact element
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95062 - 2014-09-15
alleged that the plea colloquy was defective because he was not advised of the sexual contact element
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95062 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Donald R. Kitten v. State of Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development
appeals from a circuit court order affirming a hearing examiner’s decision that he unlawfully
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3456 - 2017-09-19
appeals from a circuit court order affirming a hearing examiner’s decision that he unlawfully
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3456 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
94 CV 380 Evelyn J. Fraser v. Daniel R. Marcussen
was reached by telephone at home. When the court asked Miller why he was not at court, he stated that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11861 - 2017-09-21
was reached by telephone at home. When the court asked Miller why he was not at court, he stated that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11861 - 2017-09-21
94 CV 380 Evelyn J. Fraser v. Daniel R. Marcussen
Miller why he was not at court, he stated that he had not received a notice. The court stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11861 - 2005-03-31
Miller why he was not at court, he stated that he had not received a notice. The court stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11861 - 2005-03-31
Hector Cubero v. Dan Buchler
in an unassigned area. He alleges numerous procedural and substantive errors in the proceeding. We reject his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8239 - 2005-03-31
in an unassigned area. He alleges numerous procedural and substantive errors in the proceeding. We reject his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8239 - 2005-03-31
Micheal Locklear v. Jon Litscher
in December 2000. The named respondent was Secretary of Corrections Jon Litscher. Locklear alleged that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5213 - 2005-03-31
in December 2000. The named respondent was Secretary of Corrections Jon Litscher. Locklear alleged that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5213 - 2005-03-31