Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19301 - 19310 of 64077 for records/1000.
Search results 19301 - 19310 of 64077 for records/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Frank J. Sackatook, Jr.
sample and pay a $250 DNA surcharge. We conclude that the record does not demonstrate that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3275 - 2017-09-19
sample and pay a $250 DNA surcharge. We conclude that the record does not demonstrate that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3275 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234384 - 2019-02-13
and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234384 - 2019-02-13
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 30, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
the Court to the record in this matter, most particularly the transcript of the proceedings before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27937 - 2007-01-29
the Court to the record in this matter, most particularly the transcript of the proceedings before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27937 - 2007-01-29
State v. Walter J. Griffin
The record supports the trial court’s finding of no breach in this case. The prosecutor unequivocally stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24559 - 2006-03-22
The record supports the trial court’s finding of no breach in this case. The prosecutor unequivocally stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24559 - 2006-03-22
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
and an independent review of the Record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=936858 - 2025-04-09
and an independent review of the Record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=936858 - 2025-04-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on certiorari would be correction of the prison record, but “there is nothing substantive to correct.” ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84440 - 2014-09-15
on certiorari would be correction of the prison record, but “there is nothing substantive to correct.” ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84440 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211797 - 2018-04-25
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211797 - 2018-04-25
State v. Ricky L. Amrine
basis in the record and demonstrate a logical process of reasoning based on the facts of record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8443 - 2005-03-31
basis in the record and demonstrate a logical process of reasoning based on the facts of record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8443 - 2005-03-31
State v. Martin T. Bauknecht
for it in the record. See Elias v. State, 93 Wis. 2d 278, 281-82, 286 N.W.2d 559 (1980). A strong policy exists
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4115 - 2005-03-31
for it in the record. See Elias v. State, 93 Wis. 2d 278, 281-82, 286 N.W.2d 559 (1980). A strong policy exists
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4115 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a hearing. Upon our review of the record and the parties’ briefs, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177514 - 2017-09-21
a hearing. Upon our review of the record and the parties’ briefs, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177514 - 2017-09-21