Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19311 - 19320 of 29823 for des.
Search results 19311 - 19320 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is procedurally barred is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Fortier, 2006 WI App 11, ¶18
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=626736 - 2023-02-28
is procedurally barred is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Fortier, 2006 WI App 11, ¶18
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=626736 - 2023-02-28
State v. Aaron K. Gibbs
interpretation and our standard of review is de novo. State v. Irish, 210 Wis. 2d 107, 110, 565 N.W.2d 161 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2556 - 2005-03-31
interpretation and our standard of review is de novo. State v. Irish, 210 Wis. 2d 107, 110, 565 N.W.2d 161 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2556 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
by § 971.15(3). We therefore review the circuit court’s decision de novo. ¶9 WISCONSIN STAT. § 971.15(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44834 - 2014-09-15
by § 971.15(3). We therefore review the circuit court’s decision de novo. ¶9 WISCONSIN STAT. § 971.15(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44834 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of counsel is ultimately a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105815 - 2017-09-21
of counsel is ultimately a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105815 - 2017-09-21
State v. Tyrone Rimmer
a person’s consent for a warrantless search was voluntary, are matters of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19092 - 2005-07-25
a person’s consent for a warrantless search was voluntary, are matters of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19092 - 2005-07-25
Frontsheet
unless they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78957 - 2012-03-01
unless they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78957 - 2012-03-01
Robert B. Ciarpaglini v. Kelly Flury
was without a reasonable basis in law is a question of law to be reviewed de novo. James A.O. v. George C.B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10722 - 2005-03-31
was without a reasonable basis in law is a question of law to be reviewed de novo. James A.O. v. George C.B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10722 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jack Williams
which, if true, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9559 - 2005-03-31
which, if true, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9559 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
is a constitutional issue that an appellate court reviews de novo.” Id. A defendant who seeks resentencing because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80608 - 2012-04-09
is a constitutional issue that an appellate court reviews de novo.” Id. A defendant who seeks resentencing because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80608 - 2012-04-09
COURT OF APPEALS
defendant has received a fair trial is a constitutional question that we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137823 - 2015-03-18
defendant has received a fair trial is a constitutional question that we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137823 - 2015-03-18