Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19311 - 19320 of 69259 for had.
Search results 19311 - 19320 of 69259 for had.
[PDF]
State v. Byron A. Anderson
was under arrest, the officer had probable cause. We therefore affirm the judgment. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18439 - 2017-09-21
was under arrest, the officer had probable cause. We therefore affirm the judgment. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18439 - 2017-09-21
State v. Byron A. Anderson
was under arrest, the officer had probable cause. We therefore affirm the judgment. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18439 - 2005-06-06
was under arrest, the officer had probable cause. We therefore affirm the judgment. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18439 - 2005-06-06
[PDF]
State v. Joel N. Nitka
to five times with an army cloth webbed belt, which Nitka had looped so the metal buckles would not make
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8257 - 2017-09-19
to five times with an army cloth webbed belt, which Nitka had looped so the metal buckles would not make
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8257 - 2017-09-19
State v. James E. Bulckaen
that the JRAD provisions referred to by trial counsel had been repealed six years before Bulckaen entered his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20024 - 2005-10-19
that the JRAD provisions referred to by trial counsel had been repealed six years before Bulckaen entered his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20024 - 2005-10-19
[PDF]
State v. Sean P. Tate
. Because Tate would not have prevailed on any of these issues had counsel raised them, we affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4296 - 2017-09-19
. Because Tate would not have prevailed on any of these issues had counsel raised them, we affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4296 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was struck by a drunk driver. Zankl sued the drunk driver as well as Auto-Owners, with whom Zankl had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204672 - 2017-12-06
was struck by a drunk driver. Zankl sued the drunk driver as well as Auto-Owners, with whom Zankl had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204672 - 2017-12-06
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
Vernon knew or had reason to believe he was Anthony’s father and failed to assume parental
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95342 - 2014-09-15
Vernon knew or had reason to believe he was Anthony’s father and failed to assume parental
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95342 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
; that M.C. had been removed from A.J.T.’s care shortly after birth and had not lived with A.J.T. since
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=384803 - 2021-07-07
; that M.C. had been removed from A.J.T.’s care shortly after birth and had not lived with A.J.T. since
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=384803 - 2021-07-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
privilege had been revoked. Although Larson had an occupational license, the operating hours
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=522581 - 2022-05-17
privilege had been revoked. Although Larson had an occupational license, the operating hours
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=522581 - 2022-05-17
State v. Edgar Smith
that he had a stake in the venture. We affirm. Following the preliminary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7944 - 2005-03-31
that he had a stake in the venture. We affirm. Following the preliminary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7944 - 2005-03-31