Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19311 - 19320 of 64056 for records/1000.
Search results 19311 - 19320 of 64056 for records/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
a logical rationale based on the appropriate legal principles and facts of record. Id., ¶22. The factors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58173 - 2010-12-28
a logical rationale based on the appropriate legal principles and facts of record. Id., ¶22. The factors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58173 - 2010-12-28
COURT OF APPEALS
discretion, based on the limited record that was available to the court at the time of sentencing. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113770 - 2014-06-04
discretion, based on the limited record that was available to the court at the time of sentencing. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113770 - 2014-06-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independent review of the records as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=558439 - 2022-08-23
independent review of the records as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=558439 - 2022-08-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not done so. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and an independent review of the Record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=655893 - 2023-05-17
not done so. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and an independent review of the Record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=655893 - 2023-05-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
consideration of the report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236388 - 2019-03-06
consideration of the report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236388 - 2019-03-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
there was systematic exclusion of African-Americans from the jury venire. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209415 - 2018-03-06
there was systematic exclusion of African-Americans from the jury venire. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209415 - 2018-03-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
filing a response to the report. Upon this court’s independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114649 - 2017-09-21
filing a response to the report. Upon this court’s independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114649 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
and after conducting an independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95281 - 2014-09-15
and after conducting an independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95281 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2018AP857-CRNM 2 Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256581 - 2020-03-17
. No. 2018AP857-CRNM 2 Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256581 - 2020-03-17
CA Blank Order
in Wis. Stat. §§ 815.31 and 846.16 (2011-12).[1] Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110577 - 2014-04-16
in Wis. Stat. §§ 815.31 and 846.16 (2011-12).[1] Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110577 - 2014-04-16