Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19311 - 19320 of 63721 for records/1000.

Jeffrey Plummer v. State
. Standard of Review In certiorari actions we are confined to the record and our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8113 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Protecting
linked to the location of court and court records. While our agency appreciates this consideration
/supreme/docs/2103commentsthompson.pdf - 2022-01-04

[PDF] CA Blank Order
Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=752026 - 2024-01-24

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, but has not responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record, as mandated by Anders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=747657 - 2024-01-09

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
reviewing the records and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues with arguable merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1004236 - 2025-09-03

[PDF] CA Blank Order
for resentencing. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=854290 - 2024-09-26

[PDF] CA Blank Order
not done so. After reviewing the no-merit report and the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189361 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record as well as the no-merit report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235153 - 2019-02-20

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1032480 - 2025-11-05

[PDF] CA Blank Order
properly exercised its sentencing discretion. Upon reviewing the record, we agree with counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=757216 - 2024-01-30