Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19321 - 19330 of 58245 for speedy trial.
Search results 19321 - 19330 of 58245 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
NOTICE
involving the same child. Schweiner was convicted of violating § 948.025(1) at a jury trial in June
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33940 - 2014-09-15
involving the same child. Schweiner was convicted of violating § 948.025(1) at a jury trial in June
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33940 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
a postconviction order denying his motion for a new trial.[1] The issues are whether Hardison’s trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47973 - 2010-03-15
a postconviction order denying his motion for a new trial.[1] The issues are whether Hardison’s trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47973 - 2010-03-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised on appeal. After a jury trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=282259 - 2020-08-27
conclude there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised on appeal. After a jury trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=282259 - 2020-08-27
State v. James F. McCluskey
and a fine plus costs of $6,274. He contends the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2536 - 2005-03-31
and a fine plus costs of $6,274. He contends the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2536 - 2005-03-31
Philip Arreola v. State
not complied with, and that that failure deprived the trial court of competency to order Goodson's release
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8737 - 2005-03-31
not complied with, and that that failure deprived the trial court of competency to order Goodson's release
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8737 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
an ownership interest in that property.[1] The Worms argue that the trial court erred in granting summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40656 - 2009-09-09
an ownership interest in that property.[1] The Worms argue that the trial court erred in granting summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40656 - 2009-09-09
[PDF]
NOTICE
a postconviction order denying his motion for a new trial.1 The issues are whether Hardison’s trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47973 - 2014-09-15
a postconviction order denying his motion for a new trial.1 The issues are whether Hardison’s trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47973 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Shomari L. Robinson
hearing, and, alternatively, that the trial court erred in not allowing the evidence. We reject both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2552 - 2017-09-19
hearing, and, alternatively, that the trial court erred in not allowing the evidence. We reject both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2552 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
(2017-18).2 He alleges that prosecutorial misconduct, ineffective assistance of trial counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241493 - 2019-05-29
(2017-18).2 He alleges that prosecutorial misconduct, ineffective assistance of trial counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241493 - 2019-05-29
[PDF]
NOTICE
argue that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment to the Ramiches because the final
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40656 - 2014-09-15
argue that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment to the Ramiches because the final
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40656 - 2014-09-15