Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19331 - 19340 of 64737 for b's.
Search results 19331 - 19340 of 64737 for b's.
CA Blank Order
.” Sec. 973.155(1)(b). Whether a defendant is entitled to sentence credit under § 973.155 is a question
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141639 - 2015-05-10
.” Sec. 973.155(1)(b). Whether a defendant is entitled to sentence credit under § 973.155 is a question
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141639 - 2015-05-10
Liduvina Stensland v. Warshafsky
. Therefore, the doctrine of judicial estoppel is inapplicable. B. Issue Preclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3485 - 2005-03-31
. Therefore, the doctrine of judicial estoppel is inapplicable. B. Issue Preclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3485 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)4. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93891 - 2013-03-12
will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)4. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93891 - 2013-03-12
[PDF]
State v. Ronald J. Anderson
, or (b) his responsiveness or physical dexterity in bringing the boat to a stop and bringing the skier
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15470 - 2017-09-21
, or (b) his responsiveness or physical dexterity in bringing the boat to a stop and bringing the skier
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15470 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
N.W.2d 711 (1985). “[B]oth the performance and prejudice components of the ineffectiveness inquiry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142619 - 2017-09-21
N.W.2d 711 (1985). “[B]oth the performance and prejudice components of the ineffectiveness inquiry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142619 - 2017-09-21
Alan D. Eisenberg v. Circuit Court for Milwaukee County
. B. Whether Eisenberg was afforded his right of allocution. Eisenberg also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13357 - 2005-03-31
. B. Whether Eisenberg was afforded his right of allocution. Eisenberg also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13357 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court for Marathon County: GREGORY B. HUBER, Judge. Affirmed. Before Stark, P.J., Hruz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166609 - 2017-09-21
of the circuit court for Marathon County: GREGORY B. HUBER, Judge. Affirmed. Before Stark, P.J., Hruz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166609 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. STAT. § 346.63(1)(b), as adopted by a City of West Bend municipal ordinance. Lang appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=965317 - 2025-06-04
. STAT. § 346.63(1)(b), as adopted by a City of West Bend municipal ordinance. Lang appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=965317 - 2025-06-04
[PDF]
NOTICE
is clear of traffic within a safe distance”; (b) “in preparation for a left turn”; or (c) “where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54519 - 2014-09-15
is clear of traffic within a safe distance”; (b) “in preparation for a left turn”; or (c) “where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54519 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Leon A. Franklin
mother, and misdemeanor battery contrary to §§ 948.03(2)(b), 940.30 and 940.19(1), STATS. On appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12461 - 2017-09-21
mother, and misdemeanor battery contrary to §§ 948.03(2)(b), 940.30 and 940.19(1), STATS. On appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12461 - 2017-09-21