Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19331 - 19340 of 68502 for did.
Search results 19331 - 19340 of 68502 for did.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that the trial court’s “plea colloquy did not inform [him] that he could be sentenced to life imprisonment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245558 - 2019-08-21
that the trial court’s “plea colloquy did not inform [him] that he could be sentenced to life imprisonment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245558 - 2019-08-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the circuit court did not err. Therefore, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Herling was convicted by a jury of two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131736 - 2017-09-21
that the circuit court did not err. Therefore, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Herling was convicted by a jury of two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131736 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Eric J. Yelk
. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and RULE 809.32(1), STATS. Yelk did not respond. After an independent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11854 - 2017-09-21
. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and RULE 809.32(1), STATS. Yelk did not respond. After an independent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11854 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI App 55
and reverse on that issue, but we conclude the court did not err in ordering absolute sobriety and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192767 - 2017-09-21
and reverse on that issue, but we conclude the court did not err in ordering absolute sobriety and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192767 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
an evidentiary hearing because trial counsel’s comments and closing arguments did not constitute a concession
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=518076 - 2022-05-05
an evidentiary hearing because trial counsel’s comments and closing arguments did not constitute a concession
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=518076 - 2022-05-05
[PDF]
Eau Claire County Department of Human Services v. Sherrinda M.
was not fully tried. 3 Hicks, 202 Wis. 2d at 160. Sherrinda does not argue that the jury did not hear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6650 - 2017-09-20
was not fully tried. 3 Hicks, 202 Wis. 2d at 160. Sherrinda does not argue that the jury did not hear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6650 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
contends that law enforcement did not have reasonable suspicion to stop his vehicle. I reject
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=661120 - 2023-05-25
contends that law enforcement did not have reasonable suspicion to stop his vehicle. I reject
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=661120 - 2023-05-25
Mike Brolin v. Kim Bauers
erred because it did not consider evidence that the eviction was retaliatory or determine whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21508 - 2005-03-31
erred because it did not consider evidence that the eviction was retaliatory or determine whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21508 - 2005-03-31
State v. Timothy M. Secrist
Secrist. The officer did not see any smoke in the vehicle nor did he make any physical observations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12944 - 2005-03-31
Secrist. The officer did not see any smoke in the vehicle nor did he make any physical observations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12944 - 2005-03-31
Thomas Konkel v. Town of Elba Town Board
a fully articulated rationale for disapproving the petition.[1] The town board did not exceed its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10913 - 2005-03-31
a fully articulated rationale for disapproving the petition.[1] The town board did not exceed its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10913 - 2005-03-31