Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19341 - 19350 of 40261 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 19341 - 19350 of 40261 for financial disclosure statement.
COURT OF APPEALS
disagree. The court’s statement was an accurate statement of law, correctly advising the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93609 - 2013-03-06
disagree. The court’s statement was an accurate statement of law, correctly advising the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93609 - 2013-03-06
State v. John E. Prochaska
“For what?” response to Deputy Pierce’s statement that he was going to be charged with causing injury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14217 - 2005-03-31
“For what?” response to Deputy Pierce’s statement that he was going to be charged with causing injury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14217 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Karl Julius James
-2- apparently contradictory statements; and (4) the State failed to turn over alleged exculpatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7794 - 2017-09-19
-2- apparently contradictory statements; and (4) the State failed to turn over alleged exculpatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7794 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a written statement because it was hearsay; and (6) that he is entitled to a new parole hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102207 - 2017-09-21
a written statement because it was hearsay; and (6) that he is entitled to a new parole hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102207 - 2017-09-21
Jon Lancaster, Inc. v. Floor Care Associates, Inc.
because it did not attribute any allegedly false statements to any of the individually named third-party
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6111 - 2005-03-31
because it did not attribute any allegedly false statements to any of the individually named third-party
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6111 - 2005-03-31
Kimberly K. Larsen v. School District of Rhinelander
and an itemized statement of relief sought. Upon receipt of such claim, the school district has 120 days
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12997 - 2005-03-31
and an itemized statement of relief sought. Upon receipt of such claim, the school district has 120 days
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12997 - 2005-03-31
State v. Walter L. Williams
. Here, the trial court’s comments at sentencing were inadequate. A statement that the court considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10907 - 2005-03-31
. Here, the trial court’s comments at sentencing were inadequate. A statement that the court considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10907 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
with a “statement of negotiated plea.” That document clearly states that the State may recommend jail time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44480 - 2009-12-09
with a “statement of negotiated plea.” That document clearly states that the State may recommend jail time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44480 - 2009-12-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for statements made for the purpose of medical diagnosis or treatment, see WIS. STAT. § 908.03(4) (2015-16), 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185957 - 2017-09-21
for statements made for the purpose of medical diagnosis or treatment, see WIS. STAT. § 908.03(4) (2015-16), 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185957 - 2017-09-21
State v. Ronnie A. Malloy
the circumstantial evidence in favor of [the defendant’s] statements of the knife’s purposes.” Id. We noted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17858 - 2005-04-26
the circumstantial evidence in favor of [the defendant’s] statements of the knife’s purposes.” Id. We noted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17858 - 2005-04-26