Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19341 - 19350 of 45948 for paternity test paper work.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
Petersdorff if he would submit to a “computer voice stress analyzer” test. Petersdorff agreed. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80608 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
this test, we agree with the State that the facts here are comparable to those in Liebnitz, where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190581 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
, the police obtained a warrant to search Dowell for genetic material. Subsequent testing of the material
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50002 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Cornelius Flowers
). The manifest injustice test is rooted in constitutional concepts, requiring a showing of a serious flaw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5709 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. Id., ¶46. To determine whether closure is justified, courts apply a four-part test: (1) the party
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201052 - 2017-11-08

[PDF] State v. Shane M. Kringen
at the scene and at the hospital where he was taken for a blood test. Kringen had slurred speech
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5791 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
-of-state competitors.” Id. A four-part test has evolved for evaluating whether a tax provision
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1229 - 2017-09-19

Marion Steinberg v. Thomas R. Jensen
the jury they must agree on a “specific” cause contradicts Wisconsin's “a substantial factor test.”[2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7684 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Daniel J. Phillips
to be suspicious to me.” The officer stopped the car, smelled intoxicants, tested the driver who, it turned out
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4727 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
test results on the suspected marijuana. The circuit court was willing to grant the State’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42082 - 2009-10-13