Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19341 - 19350 of 59340 for quit claim deed.
Search results 19341 - 19350 of 59340 for quit claim deed.
Robert Stanek v. John C. Mickelson
a small claims judgment in favor of his former landlord, John Mickelson. Stanek raises various issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8794 - 2005-03-31
a small claims judgment in favor of his former landlord, John Mickelson. Stanek raises various issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8794 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and that he was entitled to an evidentiary hearing on his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106025 - 2017-09-21
and that he was entitled to an evidentiary hearing on his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106025 - 2017-09-21
State v. Sharon McBride
, as party to the crime, contrary to §§ 940.19(1) and 939.05, Stats. She claims the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9102 - 2005-03-31
, as party to the crime, contrary to §§ 940.19(1) and 939.05, Stats. She claims the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9102 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
of Markling’s probation. Markling has filed a response claiming he is entitled to additional sentence credit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96337 - 2013-05-06
of Markling’s probation. Markling has filed a response claiming he is entitled to additional sentence credit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96337 - 2013-05-06
[PDF]
Gary Olson v. Ronald Lund
appeal from a judgment dismissing their claims against Ruth Mary Olson, Ronald Lund, and Sheri Lund
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20441 - 2017-09-21
appeal from a judgment dismissing their claims against Ruth Mary Olson, Ronald Lund, and Sheri Lund
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20441 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Dean Oschmann v. Secura Insurance
judgment dismissing their claim against Secura Insurance.1 The dispute arose when Secura refused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15557 - 2017-09-21
judgment dismissing their claim against Secura Insurance.1 The dispute arose when Secura refused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15557 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
_WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
to support a claim of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, or law of the case. Per curiam opinions may
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=358526 - 2021-04-19
to support a claim of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, or law of the case. Per curiam opinions may
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=358526 - 2021-04-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to testify in support of his ineffective assistance claim. The State objected to the motion because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138240 - 2017-09-21
to testify in support of his ineffective assistance claim. The State objected to the motion because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138240 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2017-18).1 The issue is whether Poff’s claims are procedurally barred
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241154 - 2019-05-22
pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2017-18).1 The issue is whether Poff’s claims are procedurally barred
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241154 - 2019-05-22
State v. Carl E. Cunningham
, claiming that the trial court had failed to advise him at sentencing that he could no longer own or possess
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6654 - 2005-03-31
, claiming that the trial court had failed to advise him at sentencing that he could no longer own or possess
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6654 - 2005-03-31