Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19341 - 19350 of 58507 for speedy trial.

[PDF] State v. Pha Vue
2 §§ 940.01(1), 939.32, and 939.625(1)(a).1 Vue argues the trial court erred as a matter of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3491 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] NOTICE
KESSLER, J. At issue in this appeal is whether the trial court erred when it concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53088 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. Siddique challenges the trial court’s determinations that pursuant to the WEAJA he was not a prevailing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=229477 - 2018-12-11

[PDF] Susan Hatleberg v. Norwest Bank Wisconsin
not want them to have immediate access to the trust account. Thus, Wells Fargo contends the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6024 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 27, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
damages in the amount of $5885.[1] Because we conclude that the trial court properly found that, under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27594 - 2006-12-26

J. H. Findorff & Son, Inc. v. Circuit Court for Milwaukee County
that Trenko breached the contract by not finishing its work. ¶5 The case was tried in a bench trial before
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17325 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] J. H. Findorff & Son, Inc. v. Circuit Court for Milwaukee County
was tried in a bench trial before the Honorable William J. Haese of the Milwaukee County Circuit Court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17325 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
for sentence modification. Soto argues: (1) that he received ineffective assistance of trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134241 - 2015-02-02

State v. James Podlewski
months. Section 346.65(2)(b). The trial court sentenced Podlewski to a ninety-day period
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13719 - 2005-03-31

Shannon G. Poirier v. Paula M. Poirier
.[1] Because the trial court properly exercised its discretion, we affirm the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11128 - 2005-03-31