Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19351 - 19360 of 29739 for des.
Search results 19351 - 19360 of 29739 for des.
State v. Tan Ngoc Nguyen
to the constitutional principles presents a question of law that we review de novo. Lee, 175 Wis.2d at 354, 499 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8907 - 2005-03-31
to the constitutional principles presents a question of law that we review de novo. Lee, 175 Wis.2d at 354, 499 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8907 - 2005-03-31
Steven J. Schuette v. Rebecca C. Gross-Schuette
was a question of law appropriate for de novo review. The trial court in Trost made an explicit finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26309 - 2006-08-29
was a question of law appropriate for de novo review. The trial court in Trost made an explicit finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26309 - 2006-08-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was deficient and whether such deficient performance was prejudicial are questions of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101743 - 2017-09-21
was deficient and whether such deficient performance was prejudicial are questions of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101743 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law we review de novo. Id., ¶26. ¶6 The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186540 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law we review de novo. Id., ¶26. ¶6 The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186540 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
David Kosmo v. State of Wisconsin Department of Transportation
associated with removing it. Kosmo appeals the summary judgment. We review a summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11352 - 2017-09-19
associated with removing it. Kosmo appeals the summary judgment. We review a summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11352 - 2017-09-19
State v. William L. Morford
a question of law that we review de novo. See Williams, 2001 WI App 155 at ¶9. However, a motion for relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4377 - 2005-03-31
a question of law that we review de novo. See Williams, 2001 WI App 155 at ¶9. However, a motion for relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4377 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Jackson Electric Cooperative v. Brockway Sanitary District No. 1
court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, employing the same methodology as the trial court. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16116 - 2017-09-21
court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, employing the same methodology as the trial court. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16116 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Paul S. Gantner v. Diane Jo Gantner
amounted to only $255. Any effect of this disputed fact is de minimis. 4 We deem the lack of specific
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3809 - 2017-09-20
amounted to only $255. Any effect of this disputed fact is de minimis. 4 We deem the lack of specific
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3809 - 2017-09-20
John Vishnevsky v. Dempsey
At the outset, we reject Vishnevsky’s suggestion that our standard of review is de novo because the issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2873 - 2005-03-31
At the outset, we reject Vishnevsky’s suggestion that our standard of review is de novo because the issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2873 - 2005-03-31
Robert Tomaszewski v. David Giera
. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Isaac J.R., 220 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5643 - 2005-03-31
. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Isaac J.R., 220 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5643 - 2005-03-31