Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19351 - 19360 of 68502 for did.

COURT OF APPEALS
that Schwigel’s plea did not result from a misunderstood burden of proof because any discussion of allocating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34660 - 2008-11-25

[PDF] State v. Emmett J. Wimmer
2 statements he made at the scene of an accident, asserting that a police officer did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5762 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
. As a result, Barber commenced this action seeking eviction and the unpaid rent. Weichman did not appear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28331 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] City of Oshkosh v. Theodore J. Plana
a motion for a continuance. We conclude that the circuit court did not erroneously exercise its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5767 - 2017-09-19

Daniel Frasch v. Marianne A. Cooke
. The Department contends that Frasch is not entitled to certiorari review because (1) Frasch did not demonstrate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14186 - 2005-05-09

COURT OF APPEALS
and suffocation) was dismissed because Ms. H. did not appear at the preliminary examination. The State also told
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102980 - 2013-10-14

Columbia County Department of Human Services v. Robert L. W.
the children were in foster care, Robert did not have telephone contact with his children but wrote them
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6038 - 2013-02-27

City of Madison v. John P. Kavanaugh
at the intersection. Kinderman did not observe any other vehicles on Fair Oaks in the intersection or in the area
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9960 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
responsibility for what he did to the victim. ¶10 The circuit court stated that “there is definitely a need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1033786 - 2025-11-11

State v. Daniel G.H.
support and amending a paternity judgment. Daniel argues that the jury’s finding that he did not consent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3630 - 2005-03-31