Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19361 - 19370 of 58950 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 19361 - 19370 of 58950 for SMALL CLAIMS.
COURT OF APPEALS
and misrepresentation claims against CBL Partners, LLC, and its member, Lon Feia, and denied his motions after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35753 - 2009-03-09
and misrepresentation claims against CBL Partners, LLC, and its member, Lon Feia, and denied his motions after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35753 - 2009-03-09
[PDF]
State v. Richard P.T.
Sherry filed a motion to modify the divorce judgment in November 1997 claiming that Richard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15426 - 2017-09-21
Sherry filed a motion to modify the divorce judgment in November 1997 claiming that Richard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15426 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2011-12)[1] motion without a hearing. Wilson claimed he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121636 - 2014-09-15
of the circuit court denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2011-12)[1] motion without a hearing. Wilson claimed he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121636 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
. He claimed he would have asserted his right to testify at trial, stating he wanted to testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31738 - 2014-09-15
. He claimed he would have asserted his right to testify at trial, stating he wanted to testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31738 - 2014-09-15
State v. Sol Coleman, Jr.
A. Evidentiary Rulings. Coleman claims the trial court erroneously excluded three pieces
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8083 - 2005-03-31
A. Evidentiary Rulings. Coleman claims the trial court erroneously excluded three pieces
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8083 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
while claiming to be “teaching” them. ¶3 At trial, the State presented extensive testimony from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=555655 - 2022-08-16
while claiming to be “teaching” them. ¶3 At trial, the State presented extensive testimony from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=555655 - 2022-08-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that raised two grounds for relief: (1) a claim that the extended supervision portions of two of his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101873 - 2017-09-21
that raised two grounds for relief: (1) a claim that the extended supervision portions of two of his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101873 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, the motion “did not raise sufficient facts with respect to the advice Smith claims he was given before he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208680 - 2018-02-16
, the motion “did not raise sufficient facts with respect to the advice Smith claims he was given before he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208680 - 2018-02-16
[PDF]
NOTICE
. § 974.06 (2003-04)1 motion. Patterson claims he 1 All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28154 - 2014-09-15
. § 974.06 (2003-04)1 motion. Patterson claims he 1 All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28154 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
to address Drow’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim “because his claims are merely bald allegations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31050 - 2007-12-03
to address Drow’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim “because his claims are merely bald allegations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31050 - 2007-12-03