Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19361 - 19370 of 82654 for order for a biological sample for drug testing.

Dale A. Gleffe v. Romayne R. Gleffe
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 16, 2002 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of Appe...
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4524 - 2005-03-31

Jon A. Haas v. Vance R. Stark
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 13, 2001 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk, Court of Appeal...
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2964 - 2005-03-31

James D. Luedtke v. Roger A. Luedtke
of the appeal." Roger did not respond to James' one-page brief, and we ordered submission for decision solely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11336 - 2005-03-31

James A. Billington v. Wilbert C. Oldenhoff
, Defendants. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Portage County: federic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7217 - 2005-03-31

Steven Van Erden v. Joseph A. Sobczak
Reported at 260 Wis. 2d 81, 659 N.W.2d 896 (Ct. App. 2003-Published) Order Filed: September 12, 2003
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16638 - 2005-03-31

Patricia A. Finley v. James J. Finley
in ordering that James pay 50% of his net profits from moonlighting to Patricia as maintenance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4111 - 2005-03-31

Linn A. Duesterbeck v. Town of Koshkonong
with regard to their 1993 claims under the uniformity clause, for which it ordered a refund of the excessive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14686 - 2005-03-31

Patricia A. Vrieze v. John H. Vrieze
a party to be relieved from a judgment, order or stipulation on the grounds of mistake, inadvertence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13115 - 2005-03-31

Scott R. Wilke v. Judith A. Wilke
, Respondent-Respondent. APPEAL from an order of the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10554 - 2005-03-31

Michael J. Glunz v. Laura A. Sokol
erroneously exercised its discretion when it ordered the Kemper account to be discounted 20% for equalization
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2605 - 2005-03-31