Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19371 - 19380 of 30178 for de.
Search results 19371 - 19380 of 30178 for de.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a trial court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. Krier v. Vilione, 2009 WI 45, ¶14, 317 Wis. 2d 288
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74750 - 2014-09-15
a trial court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. Krier v. Vilione, 2009 WI 45, ¶14, 317 Wis. 2d 288
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74750 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. Id., ¶14. ¶8 Towns has not demonstrated any procedural inadequacy in his no‑merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45542 - 2010-01-11
review de novo. Id., ¶14. ¶8 Towns has not demonstrated any procedural inadequacy in his no‑merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45542 - 2010-01-11
State v. Everton Taylor
. Mitchell, 167 Wis. 2d 672, 682, 482 N.W.2d 364 (1992), and we determine de novo whether the facts satisfy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3438 - 2005-03-31
. Mitchell, 167 Wis. 2d 672, 682, 482 N.W.2d 364 (1992), and we determine de novo whether the facts satisfy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3438 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
David Kosmo v. State of Wisconsin Department of Transportation
associated with removing it. Kosmo appeals the summary judgment. We review a summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11352 - 2017-09-19
associated with removing it. Kosmo appeals the summary judgment. We review a summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11352 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.” Id. Second, we apply constitutional principles to those facts de novo. Id. 3 ¶9 Undraitis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142334 - 2017-09-21
.” Id. Second, we apply constitutional principles to those facts de novo. Id. 3 ¶9 Undraitis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142334 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
principles to those facts de novo.” Id. ¶13 Dancel contends that the lineup in this case was impermissibly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=700811 - 2023-09-12
principles to those facts de novo.” Id. ¶13 Dancel contends that the lineup in this case was impermissibly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=700811 - 2023-09-12
[PDF]
State v. Keith M. Carey
). ¶8 Statutory construction is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Leitner, 2002 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6587 - 2017-09-19
). ¶8 Statutory construction is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Leitner, 2002 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6587 - 2017-09-19
Robert Tomaszewski v. David Giera
. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Isaac J.R., 220 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5643 - 2005-03-31
. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Isaac J.R., 220 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5643 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. Teff v. Unity Health Plans Ins. Corp., 2003 WI App 115, ¶42, 265 Wis. 2d 703, 666 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65190 - 2011-05-31
review de novo. Teff v. Unity Health Plans Ins. Corp., 2003 WI App 115, ¶42, 265 Wis. 2d 703, 666 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65190 - 2011-05-31
Korhumel Steel Corporation v. Angie Wandler
of proof is a question of law we review de novo, see Spindler v. Spindler, 207 Wis.2d 327, 338, 558 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14272 - 2005-03-31
of proof is a question of law we review de novo, see Spindler v. Spindler, 207 Wis.2d 327, 338, 558 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14272 - 2005-03-31