Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19381 - 19390 of 64771 for b's.
Search results 19381 - 19390 of 64771 for b's.
COURT OF APPEALS
discovered evidence because: (a) the trial court found Levi was not credible; and (b) in the context
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39258 - 2009-08-10
discovered evidence because: (a) the trial court found Levi was not credible; and (b) in the context
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39258 - 2009-08-10
COURT OF APPEALS
was prejudicial. State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d 628, 633, 369 N.W.2d 711 (1985). “[B]oth the performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142619 - 2015-06-02
was prejudicial. State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d 628, 633, 369 N.W.2d 711 (1985). “[B]oth the performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142619 - 2015-06-02
COURT OF APPEALS
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: MArshall B. Murray, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115232 - 2014-06-23
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: MArshall B. Murray, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115232 - 2014-06-23
Dunhill Temps of Milwaukee, Inc. v. Susan A. Covert
Rule 809.23(1)(b)5, Stats. [1] Although Covert and Site refer this court to § 814.02, Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11067 - 2005-03-31
Rule 809.23(1)(b)5, Stats. [1] Although Covert and Site refer this court to § 814.02, Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11067 - 2005-03-31
State v. David A. Morris
imposition of sentence after trial. (b) The categories in par. (a) include custody of the convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2329 - 2005-03-31
imposition of sentence after trial. (b) The categories in par. (a) include custody of the convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2329 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Patrick D. O'Donnell
” and that he requested permission to search O’Donnell’s vehicle “[b]ecause of the information I received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14878 - 2017-09-21
” and that he requested permission to search O’Donnell’s vehicle “[b]ecause of the information I received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14878 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Shrum with one count of repeated sexual assault of a child. See WIS. STAT. § 948.025(1)(b).1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65995 - 2014-09-15
Shrum with one count of repeated sexual assault of a child. See WIS. STAT. § 948.025(1)(b).1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65995 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Wendy Enright v. Pleasant View LTD Partnerships
from a judgment of the circuit court for Racine County: ALLAN B. TORHORST, Judge. Affirmed in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14948 - 2017-09-21
from a judgment of the circuit court for Racine County: ALLAN B. TORHORST, Judge. Affirmed in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14948 - 2017-09-21
Frontsheet
of due process. (b) There was such an infirmity of proof establishing the misconduct or medical
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49434 - 2010-04-27
of due process. (b) There was such an infirmity of proof establishing the misconduct or medical
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49434 - 2010-04-27
COURT OF APPEALS
offender, contrary to Wis. Stat. §§ 943.30(1) and 939.62(1)(b) (2009-10).[1] He appeals from the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63275 - 2011-05-03
offender, contrary to Wis. Stat. §§ 943.30(1) and 939.62(1)(b) (2009-10).[1] He appeals from the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63275 - 2011-05-03