Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19381 - 19390 of 29832 for des.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
Lakes Course was the de minimis time associated with routine general manager and staff accountant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191425 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] James H. Cameron v. Jane P. Cameron
support arrearages requires interpretation of ch. 767, STATS., which is a question of law we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8588 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Earl Steele III
-CR 4 ANALYSIS ¶4 We review de novo a circuit court’s conclusion that a guilty plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2174 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Bradley Clark v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
unless otherwise noted. No. 97-0970 4 interpretation is a question of law which we review de
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17241 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
facts de novo. Id.[3] ¶9 Undraitis argues that she was in custody and therefore she should have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142334 - 2015-05-20

[PDF] State v. Ryan E. Baker
interpretation that we review de novo. In re Commitment of Burris, 2004 WI 91, ¶31, 273 Wis. 2d 294, 682 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7347 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Thomas J. Justmann v. Portage County
of statutory interpretation de novo. State v. Sveum, 2002 WI App 105, ¶5, 254 Wis. 2d 868, 648 N.W.2d 496
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7124 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Michael J. Moran
standard is a legal conclusion which is reviewed de novo). However, at other points in his brief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12619 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI App 25
reasonable suspicion to conduct a traffic stop is a legal question that we review de novo, accepting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=929199 - 2025-05-19

COURT OF APPEALS
they are clearly erroneous, but review de novo whether those facts satisfy the standard of probable cause. County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41938 - 2009-10-07