Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19381 - 19390 of 58250 for speedy trial.
Search results 19381 - 19390 of 58250 for speedy trial.
State v. Rhonda L. Ziegler
claims error in the trial court's admission of an Intoxilyzer test result without expert testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10764 - 2005-03-31
claims error in the trial court's admission of an Intoxilyzer test result without expert testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10764 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2020AP2161 2 After a jury trial, Ferguson was convicted of one count of first-degree intentional
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=471714 - 2022-01-19
. No. 2020AP2161 2 After a jury trial, Ferguson was convicted of one count of first-degree intentional
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=471714 - 2022-01-19
[PDF]
Vanessa Henningfeld v. Judith Fischer
revoked his 1988 Will. Because the trial court correctly concluded that the 1993 Will was procured
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13000 - 2017-09-21
revoked his 1988 Will. Because the trial court correctly concluded that the 1993 Will was procured
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13000 - 2017-09-21
Sauk County Department of Human Services v. James Carney
that the applicable statute of limitations barred recovery for the 1989 services and that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11952 - 2005-03-31
that the applicable statute of limitations barred recovery for the 1989 services and that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11952 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
(2017-18).1 We affirm. Brantner was charged with first-degree intentional homicide. A jury trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=277314 - 2020-08-12
(2017-18).1 We affirm. Brantner was charged with first-degree intentional homicide. A jury trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=277314 - 2020-08-12
State v. Todd D. Moskonas
the postconviction court correctly concluded, as a matter of law, that the trial court was empowered to impose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10768 - 2005-03-31
the postconviction court correctly concluded, as a matter of law, that the trial court was empowered to impose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10768 - 2005-03-31
State v. James R. Sanders
postconviction motion. He argues that the State’s sentence recommendation violated the plea agreement, his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3784 - 2005-03-31
postconviction motion. He argues that the State’s sentence recommendation violated the plea agreement, his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3784 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Shannon G. Poirier v. Paula M. Poirier
the support obligation.1 Because the trial court properly exercised its discretion, we affirm the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11128 - 2017-09-19
the support obligation.1 Because the trial court properly exercised its discretion, we affirm the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11128 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Harold A. Kuik
ineffective assistance of trial counsel. First, Kuik argues that his No(s). 00-2646-CR 2 counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3091 - 2017-09-20
ineffective assistance of trial counsel. First, Kuik argues that his No(s). 00-2646-CR 2 counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3091 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Rhonda L. Ziegler
claims error in the trial court's admission of an Intoxilyzer test result without expert testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10764 - 2017-09-20
claims error in the trial court's admission of an Intoxilyzer test result without expert testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10764 - 2017-09-20