Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19391 - 19400 of 30191 for de.
Search results 19391 - 19400 of 30191 for de.
COURT OF APPEALS
is not bound by the trial court’s conclusions, and reviews the matter de novo. See id. at 112. ¶18
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74375 - 2011-12-11
is not bound by the trial court’s conclusions, and reviews the matter de novo. See id. at 112. ¶18
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74375 - 2011-12-11
[PDF]
WI 136
will be affirmed unless clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58034 - 2014-09-15
will be affirmed unless clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58034 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Mark Capistrant v. Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital, Inc.
Wis. 2d 599, 607, 547 N.W.2d 578, 580–581 (1996). We interpret and apply the applicable statutes de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6016 - 2017-09-19
Wis. 2d 599, 607, 547 N.W.2d 578, 580–581 (1996). We interpret and apply the applicable statutes de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6016 - 2017-09-19
WI App 103 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP1760-CR Complete Titl...
a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Haase, 2006 WI App 86, ¶5, 293 Wis. 2d 322, 716 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85662 - 2013-04-29
a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Haase, 2006 WI App 86, ¶5, 293 Wis. 2d 322, 716 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85662 - 2013-04-29
2007 WI APP 172
review summary judgments de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court. Grams v. Milk Prods
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29294 - 2007-07-24
review summary judgments de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court. Grams v. Milk Prods
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29294 - 2007-07-24
[PDF]
State v. Earl Steele III
-CR 4 ANALYSIS ¶4 We review de novo a circuit court’s conclusion that a guilty plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2174 - 2017-09-19
-CR 4 ANALYSIS ¶4 We review de novo a circuit court’s conclusion that a guilty plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2174 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court has the discretion to deny the claim without a hearing. Ibid. We review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78627 - 2014-09-15
court has the discretion to deny the claim without a hearing. Ibid. We review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78627 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Antraun Jordan
was lawful, presents an issue of law that we review de novo. See State v. Krier, 165 Wis.2d 673, 676, 478
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8870 - 2017-09-19
was lawful, presents an issue of law that we review de novo. See State v. Krier, 165 Wis.2d 673, 676, 478
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8870 - 2017-09-19
2010 WI APP 28
and issued an injunction. Ladd did not seek de novo review or file a notice of appeal. Soon after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46298 - 2010-02-23
and issued an injunction. Ladd did not seek de novo review or file a notice of appeal. Soon after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46298 - 2010-02-23
[PDF]
State v. Stanley Egerson
). As such, our review is de novo. See id. However, we value and take particular note of the decisions of our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12695 - 2017-09-21
). As such, our review is de novo. See id. However, we value and take particular note of the decisions of our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12695 - 2017-09-21