Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19391 - 19400 of 36304 for e's.
Search results 19391 - 19400 of 36304 for e's.
State v. Dawn C. Moline
: On behalf of the plaintiff-respondent, the cause was submitted on the brief of James E. Doyle, attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14527 - 2005-03-31
: On behalf of the plaintiff-respondent, the cause was submitted on the brief of James E. Doyle, attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14527 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and to program participation; (d) developed an adequate parole plan; and (e) reached a point where release would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36016 - 2009-03-30
and to program participation; (d) developed an adequate parole plan; and (e) reached a point where release would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36016 - 2009-03-30
State v. Barry Bartle
County: JAMES E. WELKER, Judge. Affirmed. Before Vergeront, Roggensack and Deininger, JJ. PER CURIAM
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11513 - 2005-03-31
County: JAMES E. WELKER, Judge. Affirmed. Before Vergeront, Roggensack and Deininger, JJ. PER CURIAM
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11513 - 2005-03-31
September Table of Unpublished Opinions
08-17-2005 Affirmed 2004AP002030 CR State v. Michael E. Stumps
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19835 - 2005-10-02
08-17-2005 Affirmed 2004AP002030 CR State v. Michael E. Stumps
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19835 - 2005-10-02
[PDF]
Robert Pence v. M&I Central State Bank
(d) The judgment is void; (e) The judgment has been satisfied, released or discharged; (f
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5086 - 2017-09-19
(d) The judgment is void; (e) The judgment has been satisfied, released or discharged; (f
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5086 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Morgan V.
is decided by a single judge pursuant to §752.31(2)(e), STATS. No. 98-3188 2 exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14755 - 2017-09-21
is decided by a single judge pursuant to §752.31(2)(e), STATS. No. 98-3188 2 exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14755 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. RULES 809.19(1)(a), (d)-(e) require appropriate references to the record and legal authorities
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75739 - 2014-09-15
. RULES 809.19(1)(a), (d)-(e) require appropriate references to the record and legal authorities
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75739 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
“a sufficient reason why his current ‘spin’ on th[e] already adjudicated issue was not previously raised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121169 - 2014-09-15
“a sufficient reason why his current ‘spin’ on th[e] already adjudicated issue was not previously raised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121169 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
or sexual intercourse with a person under age thirteen), contrary to WIS. STAT. § 948.02(1)(e
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=610983 - 2023-01-18
or sexual intercourse with a person under age thirteen), contrary to WIS. STAT. § 948.02(1)(e
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=610983 - 2023-01-18
[PDF]
NOTICE
was that “[h]e did not foresee [Dubose’s] subsequent effect” (essentially because of his pro se status
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31461 - 2014-09-15
was that “[h]e did not foresee [Dubose’s] subsequent effect” (essentially because of his pro se status
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31461 - 2014-09-15