Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1941 - 1950 of 17421 for Cost.

State v. James A. Torpen
of probation the payment of special prosecutor’s fees not allowed under the costs statute, Wis. Stat. § 973.06
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3520 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Wisconsin Mall Properties, LLC v. Younkers, Inc.
by the condemnation of a lease; and (2) Younkers’ obligation to pay costs the Mall incurred in connection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20110 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. James A. Torpen
of probation the payment of special prosecutor’s fees not allowed under the costs statute, WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3520 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
fees and costs to Boardman Law Firm, which successfully represented Hyrad and Nelson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182877 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
prejudgment interest since 2010 and costs and attorney fees as allowed by law. ¶3 The parties entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=482452 - 2022-02-10

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Lynn E. Morrissey
that Attorney Morrissey be ordered to pay the costs No. 2005AP255-D 2 of the disciplinary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20715 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Ronald W. Morters v. Charles H. Barr
’ motion for costs and attorney’s fees on the grounds that Morters’ claims were frivolous under WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5653 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WI APP 12
fees and costs incurred to obtain such damages. Heritage Farms argues § 26.21 mandates that double
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57319 - 2014-09-15

Wisconsin Mall Properties, LLC v. Younkers, Inc.
by the condemnation of a lease; and (2) Younkers’ obligation to pay costs the Mall incurred in connection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20110 - 2006-01-09

2011 WI APP 12
and costs incurred to obtain such damages. Heritage Farms argues § 26.21 mandates that double damages
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57319 - 2011-01-30