Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1941 - 1950 of 2158 for Victor Garcia.

State v. Frank P. Howard
at 889, (quotations omitted) citing Victor v. Nebraska, 114 S. Ct. 1239, 1243 (1994). An inadequate jury
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16996 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
Mexico action, Burlington was the unqualified victor. The single, dispositive issue in the New Mexico
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125032 - 2014-10-22

[PDF] Francis Penterman, Sr. v. Wisconsin Electric Power Company
was argued by Charles D. Hoornstra, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief Richard A. Victor
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17086 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, Burlington was the unqualified victor. The single, dispositive issue in the New Mexico action ended up
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125032 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Frank P. Howard
the Winship standard. Avila, 192 Wis. 2d at 889, (quotations omitted) citing Victor v. Nebraska, 114 S
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16996 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Daniel G. Scheidell
.” Garcia v. State, 73 Wis.2d 651, 655, 245 N.W.2d 654, 656 (1976). A jury cannot search for truth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12489 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT
2016AP1276-CR State v. Nelson Garcia, Jr. Does the 6th Amendment Right to Counsel attach upon
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238555 - 2019-04-02

State v. Denis L.R.
definitions to determine the word's common and ordinary meaning. See Garcia v. Mazda Motor of Am., Inc., 2004
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18933 - 2005-07-07

[PDF] WI APP 48
of innocence); State v. Garcia, 192 Wis. 2d 845, 857–858, 532 N.W.2d 111, 115–116 (1995) (Alford pleas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110489 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Judith L. Kiernan
on that basis. See, e.g., United States v. Garcia, 936 F.2d 648, 652 (2d Cir. 1991); United States v
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17298 - 2017-09-21