Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1941 - 1950 of 30175 for consulta de causas.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
are otherwise addressed by us de novo. See State v. McDermott, 2012 WI App 14, ¶9 n.2, 339 Wis. 2d 316, 810
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99684 - 2014-09-15

WI App 44 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP2932 Complete Title of...
to vacate the award on the narrow grounds set forth in § 788.10 is a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94523 - 2013-04-23

COURT OF APPEALS
that the uncharged, read-in offenses might have on his sentence. This is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58772 - 2011-01-10

2008 WI APP 12
Loth’s motion. This appeal followed.[2] Standard of Review ¶8 We review de novo the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31279 - 2008-01-29

[PDF] Milwaukee Transport Services, Inc. v. Department of Workforce Development
, this would present a pure question of law and be subject to our de novo review. See Thelen v. DHSS, 143
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2352 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
do not remand when the issues raised are otherwise addressed by us de novo. See State v. McDermott
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99684 - 2013-07-22

State v. Jimmy Reed
is a question of law subject to our de novo review. State v. Stankus, 220 Wis. 2d 232, 237-38, 582 N.W.2d 468
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15862 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Felipe M. Benitez
and, if it was, whether it was prejudicial are questions of law which we review de novo. State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis.2d 628
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7902 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
. The circuit court concluded on its de novo review that Scot Forge terminated the employment of Brandt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78454 - 2012-03-13

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
should be entertained. ¶8 Angela F., proceeding pro se, petitioned the circuit court for de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101997 - 2017-09-21