Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1941 - 1950 of 29958 for de.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. Strasser v. Transtech Mobile Fleet Serv., Inc., 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208832 - 2018-02-27

[PDF] State v. James L. Holloway
of a motion for a Machner hearing de novo. State v. Tatum, 191 Wis.2d 547, 551, 530 N.W.2d 407, 408 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8115 - 2017-09-19

State v. Antonio Valtierrez
the deficient performance prejudiced the defendant present questions of law, which we review de novo. Pitsch
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5517 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Floyd Carter
either the deficiency or the prejudice prong is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16079 - 2017-09-21

State v. Floyd Carter
either the deficiency or the prejudice prong is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16079 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
and the jury verdict. Standard of Review ΒΆ5 We review a grant or denial of summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30068 - 2007-08-22

COURT OF APPEALS
(1980). Whether a contract is ambiguous also is a question of law that we review de novo. Wausau
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91898 - 2013-01-23

Joyce Naomi Hamm v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
, the interpretation and application of statutes to undisputed facts are questions of law which we decide de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13497 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that we review de novo. Wausau Underwriters Ins. Co. v. Dane County, 142 Wis. 2d 315
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91898 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI App 146
de novo whether the circuit court properly granted or denied summary judgment. See Racine Cnty. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103831 - 2017-09-21