Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1941 - 1950 of 17242 for probate/1000.
Search results 1941 - 1950 of 17242 for probate/1000.
[PDF]
Dwayne G. Thomas v. David M. Schwarz
of Hearings and Appeals (Division) had properly revoked Thomas’s probation. Thomas’s probation was revoked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18649 - 2017-09-21
of Hearings and Appeals (Division) had properly revoked Thomas’s probation. Thomas’s probation was revoked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18649 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
eight prior operating while intoxicated (OWI) convictions, that he was on probation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=338362 - 2021-02-24
eight prior operating while intoxicated (OWI) convictions, that he was on probation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=338362 - 2021-02-24
[PDF]
State v. Floyd A. Worth
was placed on probation for three years. As conditions of his probation, Worth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13191 - 2017-09-21
was placed on probation for three years. As conditions of his probation, Worth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13191 - 2017-09-21
State v. Floyd A. Worth
. The trial court’s cumulative sentence of six years in prison was stayed, and Worth was placed on probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13191 - 2005-03-31
. The trial court’s cumulative sentence of six years in prison was stayed, and Worth was placed on probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13191 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. David J. Clark
. On March 15, 1991, the trial court withheld sentence and placed Clark on twenty years of probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4443 - 2017-09-19
. On March 15, 1991, the trial court withheld sentence and placed Clark on twenty years of probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4443 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
of probation (Rule 21) imposed on Robert B. Ciarpaglini in April 2004 by the Wisconsin Department
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32619 - 2014-03-24
of probation (Rule 21) imposed on Robert B. Ciarpaglini in April 2004 by the Wisconsin Department
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32619 - 2014-03-24
Carl Kaminski v. David H. Schwarz
of Carl Kaminski's probation. The revocation was based on Kaminski's violation of two rules of probation
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17568 - 2005-03-31
of Carl Kaminski's probation. The revocation was based on Kaminski's violation of two rules of probation
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17568 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. David R. Bjerkaas
following revocation of his probation. He contends No(s). 99-2644-CR 2 that his probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16092 - 2017-09-21
following revocation of his probation. He contends No(s). 99-2644-CR 2 that his probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16092 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Dante R. Voss
two. However, the court stayed those sentences and placed Voss on four-years’ probation for each
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18387 - 2017-09-21
two. However, the court stayed those sentences and placed Voss on four-years’ probation for each
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18387 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Timothy D. Kingstad
of No. 99-1177-CR 2 probation because such a requirement is only permissible when imposed in lieu
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15474 - 2017-09-21
of No. 99-1177-CR 2 probation because such a requirement is only permissible when imposed in lieu
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15474 - 2017-09-21