Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19401 - 19410 of 58547 for speedy trial.
Search results 19401 - 19410 of 58547 for speedy trial.
State v. Randall S. Handeland
him of several controlled substance violations. He contends that the trial court erred in denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12994 - 2005-03-31
him of several controlled substance violations. He contends that the trial court erred in denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12994 - 2005-03-31
City of Lake Mills v. Alton D. Behlke
with a prohibited alcohol concentration in violation of Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1). He challenges the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2679 - 2006-02-15
with a prohibited alcohol concentration in violation of Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1). He challenges the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2679 - 2006-02-15
City of Sheboygan v. Mary Nell Matzdorf
concentration (PAC) contrary to § 346.63(1)(b), Stats. Matzdorf argues on appeal that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12760 - 2005-03-31
concentration (PAC) contrary to § 346.63(1)(b), Stats. Matzdorf argues on appeal that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12760 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI App 150
of Patricia and Robert Szalacinski and Leon and Shirley Gonnering, following a jury trial.1 Grand Marquis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33913 - 2014-09-15
of Patricia and Robert Szalacinski and Leon and Shirley Gonnering, following a jury trial.1 Grand Marquis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33913 - 2014-09-15
2008 WI App 150
entered in favor of Patricia and Robert Szalacinski and Leon and Shirley Gonnering, following a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33913 - 2008-10-26
entered in favor of Patricia and Robert Szalacinski and Leon and Shirley Gonnering, following a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33913 - 2008-10-26
[PDF]
State v. David D. Brown
postconviction motion alleging ineffective assistance of trial counsel and requesting resentencing. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5045 - 2017-09-19
postconviction motion alleging ineffective assistance of trial counsel and requesting resentencing. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5045 - 2017-09-19
State v. Rhonda L. Ziegler
claims error in the trial court's admission of an Intoxilyzer test result without expert testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10764 - 2005-03-31
claims error in the trial court's admission of an Intoxilyzer test result without expert testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10764 - 2005-03-31
State v. James R. Sanders
postconviction motion. He argues that the State’s sentence recommendation violated the plea agreement, his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3784 - 2005-03-31
postconviction motion. He argues that the State’s sentence recommendation violated the plea agreement, his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3784 - 2005-03-31
State v. Scott R. Schoeneberg
an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. The issue is whether the trial court properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8411 - 2005-03-31
an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. The issue is whether the trial court properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8411 - 2005-03-31
Shannon G. Poirier v. Paula M. Poirier
.[1] Because the trial court properly exercised its discretion, we affirm the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11128 - 2005-03-31
.[1] Because the trial court properly exercised its discretion, we affirm the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11128 - 2005-03-31