Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19401 - 19410 of 58542 for speedy trial.
Search results 19401 - 19410 of 58542 for speedy trial.
State v. Randall S. Handeland
him of several controlled substance violations. He contends that the trial court erred in denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12994 - 2005-03-31
him of several controlled substance violations. He contends that the trial court erred in denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12994 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
argue that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment to the Ramiches because the final
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40656 - 2014-09-15
argue that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment to the Ramiches because the final
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40656 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
a postconviction order denying his motion for a new trial.1 The issues are whether Hardison’s trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47973 - 2014-09-15
a postconviction order denying his motion for a new trial.1 The issues are whether Hardison’s trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47973 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. David D. Brown
postconviction motion alleging ineffective assistance of trial counsel and requesting resentencing. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5045 - 2017-09-19
postconviction motion alleging ineffective assistance of trial counsel and requesting resentencing. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5045 - 2017-09-19
State v. Rhonda L. Ziegler
claims error in the trial court's admission of an Intoxilyzer test result without expert testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10764 - 2005-03-31
claims error in the trial court's admission of an Intoxilyzer test result without expert testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10764 - 2005-03-31
State v. James R. Sanders
postconviction motion. He argues that the State’s sentence recommendation violated the plea agreement, his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3784 - 2005-03-31
postconviction motion. He argues that the State’s sentence recommendation violated the plea agreement, his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3784 - 2005-03-31
State v. Scott R. Schoeneberg
an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. The issue is whether the trial court properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8411 - 2005-03-31
an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. The issue is whether the trial court properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8411 - 2005-03-31
Shannon G. Poirier v. Paula M. Poirier
.[1] Because the trial court properly exercised its discretion, we affirm the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11128 - 2005-03-31
.[1] Because the trial court properly exercised its discretion, we affirm the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11128 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Victor Raygoza
. STAT. § 974.06 (2003-04) motion. 1 He claims the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7533 - 2017-09-19
. STAT. § 974.06 (2003-04) motion. 1 He claims the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7533 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Carolyn A. Smiley v. William A. Smiley
physical placement expenses. She contends that the trial court based the order on an incorrect legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7796 - 2017-09-19
physical placement expenses. She contends that the trial court based the order on an incorrect legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7796 - 2017-09-19