Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19411 - 19420 of 29739 for des.
Search results 19411 - 19420 of 29739 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
and earning ability of the defendant’s dependents is on the defendant. (Emphasis added.) We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104165 - 2013-11-12
and earning ability of the defendant’s dependents is on the defendant. (Emphasis added.) We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104165 - 2013-11-12
State v. Ryan E. Baker
for jail incarceration time. These are questions of statutory interpretation that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7346 - 2005-03-31
for jail incarceration time. These are questions of statutory interpretation that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7346 - 2005-03-31
Lafayette County Department of Human Services v. Renee J. M.
” to extend the dispositional order relating to Ashley. We review the former question de novo, and the latter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3455 - 2005-03-31
” to extend the dispositional order relating to Ashley. We review the former question de novo, and the latter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3455 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of counsel is ultimately a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105815 - 2017-09-21
of counsel is ultimately a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105815 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to No. 2015AP800 4 review the record de novo and to substitute its judgment for that of the municipal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161687 - 2017-09-21
to No. 2015AP800 4 review the record de novo and to substitute its judgment for that of the municipal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161687 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
La Crosse County DHS v. Juan P.
conference. This is a question of law we review de novo. See State v. April O., 2000 WI App 70, ¶6, 233
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24670 - 2017-09-21
conference. This is a question of law we review de novo. See State v. April O., 2000 WI App 70, ¶6, 233
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24670 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
reviews de novo. Id., ¶15. ¶4 The double jeopardy provision protects against multiple punishments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41391 - 2014-09-15
reviews de novo. Id., ¶15. ¶4 The double jeopardy provision protects against multiple punishments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41391 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
determination, which this court decides de novo. Id. A. Deficient Performance ¶13 Seever argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176947 - 2017-09-21
determination, which this court decides de novo. Id. A. Deficient Performance ¶13 Seever argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176947 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
of summary judgment is de novo, and we apply the same methodology as the trial court, benefiting from its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30193 - 2014-09-15
of summary judgment is de novo, and we apply the same methodology as the trial court, benefiting from its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30193 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Lakes Course was the de minimis time associated with routine general manager and staff accountant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191425 - 2017-09-21
Lakes Course was the de minimis time associated with routine general manager and staff accountant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191425 - 2017-09-21