Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19411 - 19420 of 58547 for speedy trial.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
was convicted of four felony counts following a jury trial. He was accused of firing several gunshots near
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=783303 - 2024-04-03

[PDF] State v. James R. Sanders
recommendation violated the plea agreement, his trial attorney was ineffective for failing to object
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3784 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Michael J. Cauley
denying their § 974.06, STATS., motion for postconviction relief. The Cauleys contend that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8509 - 2017-09-19

State v. James Podlewski
months. Section 346.65(2)(b). The trial court sentenced Podlewski to a ninety-day period
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13246 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Dale P.A. v. Becky W.P.
the trial court's finding that a change of custody was necessary to Cheyenne's best interest, the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10811 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Mark Alan Harvat v. Regina Anne Harvat
is to the trial court’s award of limited maintenance in the amount of $950 per month for a period of five
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11817 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Matt Vandelac
resulting in the violations, which was done by various contractors. The trial court found that David
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21717 - 2017-09-21

Sauk County Department of Human Services v. James Carney
that the applicable statute of limitations barred recovery for the 1989 services and that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11952 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
, in violation of WIS. STAT. § 943.32(1)(a) and (2) (1987-88); the trial court imposed two twelve- year
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27193 - 2014-09-15

Ann Marie Jahimiak v. David Ralph Jahimiak
after twenty-seven years of marriage. The trial court found David’s income was $176,000 and Ann’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3518 - 2005-03-31