Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19421 - 19430 of 43367 for WA 0859 3970 0884 Jasa Desain Interior Set Kamar Ukiran Jepara Daerah Simo Boyolali.
Search results 19421 - 19430 of 43367 for WA 0859 3970 0884 Jasa Desain Interior Set Kamar Ukiran Jepara Daerah Simo Boyolali.
COURT OF APPEALS
guidelines is a “new factor.” A “new factor” is “‘a fact or set of facts highly relevant to the imposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110000 - 2014-04-07
guidelines is a “new factor.” A “new factor” is “‘a fact or set of facts highly relevant to the imposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110000 - 2014-04-07
CA Blank Order
to a sentence imposed on a prior conviction. Restitution was set at $607.08 for cleaning the home
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146229 - 2015-08-18
to a sentence imposed on a prior conviction. Restitution was set at $607.08 for cleaning the home
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146229 - 2015-08-18
[PDF]
Christine A. Blackstone v. Thomas A. Blackstone
considered the relevant factors set out in § 767.26, STATS. The trial court's maintenance decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9969 - 2017-09-19
considered the relevant factors set out in § 767.26, STATS. The trial court's maintenance decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9969 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Kristoffer A. Ashmore
that did not exist at the time of his initial postconviction motion. A new factor is a fact or set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26286 - 2017-09-21
that did not exist at the time of his initial postconviction motion. A new factor is a fact or set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26286 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jacqueline J. Cole
. The application of a statute to a particular set of facts is a question of law which we review de novo. DOR v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10542 - 2005-03-31
. The application of a statute to a particular set of facts is a question of law which we review de novo. DOR v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10542 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Richard A. Engelbrecht v. Gary J. Simon
. The trial court is also directed to set aside the court commissioner's decision as a judgment since
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13167 - 2017-09-21
. The trial court is also directed to set aside the court commissioner's decision as a judgment since
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13167 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
new factors warranting sentence modification. A new factor is “a fact or set of facts highly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=806811 - 2024-05-29
new factors warranting sentence modification. A new factor is “a fact or set of facts highly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=806811 - 2024-05-29
COURT OF APPEALS
that he is the only appellant. As set forth above, the trial court expressly held in its partial summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106335 - 2014-01-06
that he is the only appellant. As set forth above, the trial court expressly held in its partial summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106335 - 2014-01-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
by the circuit court complied with the requirements set forth in WIS. STAT. § 971.08 and State v. Brown, 2006
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=718182 - 2023-10-24
by the circuit court complied with the requirements set forth in WIS. STAT. § 971.08 and State v. Brown, 2006
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=718182 - 2023-10-24
[PDF]
Julie M. Lassa v. Todd Rongstad
, the parties entered into a stipulation dismissing the underlying defamation claim, setting the amount
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1237 - 2017-09-19
, the parties entered into a stipulation dismissing the underlying defamation claim, setting the amount
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1237 - 2017-09-19