Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19421 - 19430 of 29845 for des.

COURT OF APPEALS
to and not excluded by the court, the motion shall be treated as one for summary judgment.”).[1] We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30296 - 2007-09-17

[PDF] State v. Theodore D. Kraig
which, if true, would entitle him or her to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2593 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
is well known. We review the circuit court’s summary judgment decision de novo, employing the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101280 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] George B. Furey, Jr. v. Clarine A. Furey
, the circuit court considered de novo the issues of physical placement, child support, and maintenance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21169 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Jeffrey H. Bahn
). Whether counsel’s performance prejudiced the defendant is a question of law which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11787 - 2017-09-20

COURT OF APPEALS
assistance is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. ¶12 The trial court found that after his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88864 - 2012-10-31

COURT OF APPEALS
We consider de novo whether a defendant has been denied his due process right to be sentenced upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50110 - 2010-05-18

WI App 20 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP137 Complete Title of ...
on summary judgment is reviewed de novo, employing the same standards as the circuit court. Green Spring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91634 - 2013-02-25

COURT OF APPEALS
the defendant to relief. This is a question of law that we review de novo. If the motion raises such facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34417 - 2008-11-03

COURT OF APPEALS
de novo. ¶9 Wisconsin Stat. § 971.15(1) provides a person is not criminally responsible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44834 - 2009-12-21