Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19451 - 19460 of 98425 for court records search online.
Search results 19451 - 19460 of 98425 for court records search online.
COURT OF APPEALS
in the record. Accordingly, we affirm. By the Court.—Order affirmed. Not recommended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118597 - 2014-07-30
in the record. Accordingly, we affirm. By the Court.—Order affirmed. Not recommended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118597 - 2014-07-30
COURT OF APPEALS
for accepting his pleas and imposing his sentence. ¶16 The record also supports the court’s determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53008 - 2010-08-04
for accepting his pleas and imposing his sentence. ¶16 The record also supports the court’s determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53008 - 2010-08-04
COURT OF APPEALS
no independent confirmation in the record of Wait’s claim that he timely filed this document in the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85730 - 2012-08-07
no independent confirmation in the record of Wait’s claim that he timely filed this document in the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85730 - 2012-08-07
COURT OF APPEALS
on-the-record findings at trial that such a device was necessary; and (2) the circuit court erred in denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43443 - 2009-11-11
on-the-record findings at trial that such a device was necessary; and (2) the circuit court erred in denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43443 - 2009-11-11
COURT OF APPEALS
dissenting. [5] Although the report was marked, the record shows the State never offered and the court never
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84078 - 2012-06-25
dissenting. [5] Although the report was marked, the record shows the State never offered and the court never
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84078 - 2012-06-25
COURT OF APPEALS
the record does not reflect any findings upon which the court could have based the amount awarded, we reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53541 - 2010-08-24
the record does not reflect any findings upon which the court could have based the amount awarded, we reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53541 - 2010-08-24
COURT OF APPEALS
consists of disputed testimony and video recordings, the court applies the clearly erroneous standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74247 - 2011-11-22
consists of disputed testimony and video recordings, the court applies the clearly erroneous standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74247 - 2011-11-22
COURT OF APPEALS
, on attaining 17 years of age, petition the court to expunge the court’s record of the juvenile’s adjudication
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60478 - 2011-02-28
, on attaining 17 years of age, petition the court to expunge the court’s record of the juvenile’s adjudication
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60478 - 2011-02-28
COURT OF APPEALS
and never actually ordered Green to pay the DNA surcharge that appeared in court records as an obligation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69080 - 2011-08-09
and never actually ordered Green to pay the DNA surcharge that appeared in court records as an obligation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69080 - 2011-08-09
COURT OF APPEALS
Finally, the record supports Moreno-Richey’s allegation that the court did not explicitly inform him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81294 - 2012-04-18
Finally, the record supports Moreno-Richey’s allegation that the court did not explicitly inform him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81294 - 2012-04-18