Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19451 - 19460 of 61137 for quit claim deed/1000.

[PDF] Royster-Clark, Inc. v. Olsen's Mill, Inc.
the trial court based its denial of Royster’s interest claim on the mistaken view that Olsen’s Mill
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18790 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Charles B. Knudtson
of an intoxicant (OMVWI), as a third offense. He claims the circuit court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17890 - 2017-09-21

Royster-Clark, Inc. v. Olsen's Mill, Inc.
counterclaim.[1] Furthermore, because the trial court based its denial of Royster’s interest claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18790 - 2005-06-29

State v. John H. Fisher
to conduct an evidentiary hearing on all postconviction issues and claims that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9103 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. John H. Fisher
postconviction issues and claims that his trial counsel was ineffective and there was insufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9103 - 2017-09-19

State v. Brandon J. Matke
of an intoxicant (OMVWI) and imposed a sentence for sixth-offense OMVWI. He claims the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6804 - 2005-03-31

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. John A. Ward
claims he had prepared a "rough draft" of a venue change motion before this hearing, but decided
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16721 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Oscar Anderson, Jr.
agreement he had with a detective who, Anderson claims, promised him that if he confessed he would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11740 - 2014-09-15

Todd A. Erdmann v. SF Broadcasting of Green Bay, Inc.
to support his defamation claim. Erdmann contends that the trial court erred because the facts underlying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14503 - 2005-03-31

State v. Kelley D. Avery
postconviction motion requesting a new trial. Avery claims: (1) the jury verdict was not supported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13101 - 2005-03-31